CVE-2026-64025

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf, skmsg: fix verdict sk_data_ready racing with ktls rx

sk_psock_strp_data_ready() already checks tls_sw_has_ctx_rx() and defers to psock->saved_data_ready when a TLS RX context is present, avoiding a conflict with the TLS strparser's ownership of the receive queue (commit e91de6afa81c, "bpf: Fix running sk_skb program types with ktls").

sk_psock_verdict_data_ready() has no equivalent guard. When a socket is inserted into a sockmap (BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT) before TLS RX is configured, tls_sw_strparser_arm() saves sk_psock_verdict_data_ready as rx_ctx->saved_data_ready. On data arrival:

tls_data_ready -> tls_strp_data_ready -> tls_rx_msg_ready -> saved_data_ready() = sk_psock_verdict_data_ready() -> tcp_read_skb() drains sk_receive_queue via __skb_unlink() without calling tcp_eat_skb(), so copied_seq is not advanced.

tls_strp_msg_load() then finds tcp_inq() >= full_len (stale), calls tcp_recv_skb() on the now-empty queue, hits WARN_ON_ONCE(!first), and returns with rx_ctx->strp.anchor.frag_list pointing at a psock-owned (potentially freed) skb. tls_decrypt_sg() subsequently walks that frag_list: use-after-free.

Apply the same fix as sk_psock_strp_data_ready(): if a TLS RX context is present, call psock->saved_data_ready (sock_def_readable) to wake recv() waiters and return immediately, leaving the receive queue untouched. TLS retains sole ownership of the queue and decrypts the record normally through tls_sw_recvmsg().

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
37%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 26, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

bpf, skmsg: fix verdict sk_data_ready racing with ktls rx - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ddf8029623a1af20e984c040e89ff918158397ab
generic

bpf, skmsg: fix verdict sk_data_ready racing with ktls rx - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8a52139560f833c3975032e1f5762611e3a36d71
generic

bpf, skmsg: fix verdict sk_data_ready racing with ktls rx - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1861d369efd62d67796563bf3e01fc22e5626f8b
generic

bpf, skmsg: fix verdict sk_data_ready racing with ktls rx - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7c8cf21bc4efb4af18d6096db3f8bd06d622251c
generic

bpf, skmsg: fix verdict sk_data_ready racing with ktls rx - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9ea01768903ae47f210cd457af1dead6de7a9c3

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64025(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (335 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 59× in last 7d / 346× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 417 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:52 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:52 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-28 01:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-27 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-27 21:23 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-27 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-27 11:50 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-27 11:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-27 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-27 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-26 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-26 22:21 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-26 22:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-26 22:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-26 11:42 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-26 11:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-26 05:45 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-26 05:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-26 00:51 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-26 00:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-25 20:18 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-25 20:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-25 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-25 16:04 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-25 16:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-25 11:52 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-25 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-25 07:40 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-25 07:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-25 03:28 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-25 03:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-24 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-24 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-24 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-24 19:05 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-24 19:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-24 13:27 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-24 13:27 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-24 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-24 09:13 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-24 09:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-24 05:01 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-24 05:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-24 00:49 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-24 00:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-23 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-23 20:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-23 16:25 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-23 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-23 12:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-23 08:01 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-23 08:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-23 03:50 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-23 03:50 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-23 03:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-22 23:37 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-22 23:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-22 19:25 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-22 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-22 15:13 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-22 15:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-22 11:01 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-22 11:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-22 06:49 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-22 06:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-22 02:37 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-22 02:37 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-22 02:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-08-21 22:24 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-21 22:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-21 18:12 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-21 18:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-21 14:00 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-21 14:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-21 09:18 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-21 09:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-21 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-21 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-21 00:53 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-21 00:53 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-21 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-08-20 20:40 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-20 20:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-20 16:26 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-20 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-20 12:14 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-20 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-20 07:47 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-20 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-20 03:35 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64025?
CVE-2026-64025 is a critical vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, skmsg: fix verdict skdataready racing with ktls rx skpsockstrpdataready() already checks tlsswhasctxrx() and defers to psock->saveddataready when a TLS RX context is present, avoiding a conflict with the TLS strparser's…
When was CVE-2026-64025 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64025 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64025 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64025 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 63.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64025?
CVE-2026-64025 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 9.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64025?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64025, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64025

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64025?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.