AnyIO is a high level asynchronous concurrency and networking framework that works on top of either Trio or asyncio. Prior to 4.14.2, connect_tcp() and TLSStream.wrap() can validate internationalized host names after the standard library converts them with IDNA 2003 instead of IDNA 2008. When a connection to a non-ASCII domain is hijacked or redirected, an attacker can obtain a legitimate certificate for the different ASCII hostname produced by IDNA 2003 and present it to the client, causing the malicious endpoint's certificate to validate. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.2.
CVE-2026-63374
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (19th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.3
- EG Score
- 9.3CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 57EG Risk 57/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity93% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 19th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 18, 2026
Last Modified
September 28, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 3, 2026TLSStream IDNA 2003 host name encoding enables potential TLS certificate spoofing · Advisory · agronholm/anyio · GitHub
Affected: v4.14.2.
https://github.com/agronholm/anyio/security/advisories/GHSA-82r6-8w77-94w64.14.2
Patch available: agronholm/anyio 4.14.2
https://github.com/agronholm/anyio/releases/tag/4.14.2Fixed TLSStream.wrap() using IDNA 2003 to encode host names
Patch available: agronholm/anyio 4.14.2 (PR #1208 merged 2026-07-08)
https://github.com/agronholm/anyio/pull/1208commit 68f58915f82d (agronholm/anyio)
Patch available: agronholm/anyio 4.14.2 (contains commit 68f58915f82d)
https://github.com/agronholm/anyio/commit/68f58915f82d9be8109ebbbd8f5d70577d43f2ceVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63374(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:73930Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2.2 (rocm)
- RHSA-2026:73929Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2.2 (cuda)
- GHSA-82r6-8w77-94w6GitHub Security AdvisoriesCritical
AnyIO: TLSStream IDNA 2003 host name encoding enables potential TLS certificate spoofing
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1790621718 | 2026-09-30 | redhat |
| redhat | rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1790621713 | 2026-09-30 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| anyio | 1.0.0 ... 4.9.0 (69 versions) | 4.14.2 | — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 38× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 05:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 02:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 18:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 10:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 06:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 03:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 23:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 19:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 16:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 12:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 08:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 04:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 00:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 00:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 17:22 UTCVendor advisory
Show 23 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-01 13:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 06:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 02:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 01:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 17:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 15:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 17:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 18:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 03:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 19:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-22 16:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 15:30 UTCEG score recompute▲ 9.30
- 2026-09-22 15:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.3 · CVSS v4 → 9.3
- 2026-09-18 17:55 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:73929
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-63374?
When was CVE-2026-63374 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-63374 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63374?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63374?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63374
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63374?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.