NLTK versions before 3.10.0 default to ENFORCE=False in pathsec.py, causing all security validation functions to emit warnings instead of raising exceptions. Attackers can bypass path traversal and pickle deserialization protections by exploiting the disabled security controls that are only active when manually enabled.
CVE-2026-62388
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-22. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(high)
- EG Risk
- 38(Track)EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 26%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 22, 2026
Last Modified
August 22, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 22, 2026NLTK before 3.10.0 Insecure Default Configuration pathsec | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nltk-before-insecure-default-configuration-pathsec[CWE-1188] Default ENFORCE=False Disables All pathsec Security Controls · Advisory · nltk/nltk · GitHub
https://github.com/nltk/nltk/security/advisories/GHSA-p3m8-78j2-g5p3Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-62388(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 17× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 12:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-26 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 01:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 13:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-25 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-24 14:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 14:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-24 02:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-23 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-23 03:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 03:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-22 15:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 14:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-1188
- CVE-2017-7964EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-4001EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-27555EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-26510EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-13927EG 9.8 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-10279EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-14011EG 9.8EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-11532EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-0234EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-16272EG 9.8CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-62388?
When was CVE-2026-62388 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-62388 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-62388?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-62388?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-62388
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-62388?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.