CVE-2026-59230

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.56.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-24. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
6.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 6.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel.

This issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.17.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0.

The camel-mail component ships a MimeMultipart data format that can unmarshal a MIME multipart message. When it is configured with headersInline set to true, the unmarshal path copies the MIME headers of the incoming message onto the Camel message: it enumerates every header that is not one of the three standard ones it generates itself - Message-ID, MIME-Version and Content-Type - and calls setHeader for each, applying no HeaderFilterStrategy. The names of those MIME headers come from the message being unmarshalled, so a sender able to influence the message could place a header whose name falls in the Camel-internal namespace and have it set on the Exchange. Camel components read control headers from that namespace to override their configured behaviour - the camel-sql producer, for instance, takes the statement to execute from a Camel header when one is present - so an injected header could redirect what a downstream step in the route does with data the route author never intended it to take from the message. Which sinks are reachable, and what the consequences are, depends entirely on what the route does after the unmarshal step. The camel-mail consumer already applied a header filter strategy on its own inbound path, so this was the parallel inbound path into the same component that the earlier hardening did not cover. The affected copy is reached only when headersInline is enabled, which is not the default: with the default setting the MIME headers are surfaced as attachments rather than as message headers, and are not affected. The behaviour dates back to the introduction of the data format in 2.17.0 and was present on every release line until this fix.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, leave headersInline at its default of false where the inline headers are not needed, since the copy is only reached when it is enabled. Where it must stay enabled, strip Camel-internal headers immediately after the unmarshal step, for example with removeHeaders(“Camel*”) placed before any processor or producer that reads control headers, and do not unmarshal MIME content from an untrusted sender into a route that dispatches on header values. As defence in depth, treat the header names of any MIME message arriving from outside the trust boundary as untrusted input.

CVSS v3
6.5
EG Score
6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
45
EG Risk 45/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity65% × 45%
The EG Score, 6.5 of 10.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
50th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 24, 2026

Last Modified

October 12, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-59230 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-59230.html

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatcamel-mail2026-09-24redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.apache.camel:camel-mail4.19.0, 4.20.0, 4.21.0
  • 2.17.0 up to 4.14.9: fixed in 4.14.9
  • 4.15.0 up to 4.18.4: fixed in 4.18.4
  • 4.19.0 up to 4.22.0: fixed in 4.22.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 68× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 113 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 13 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-12 15:29 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-11 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 16:51 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 14:14 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  10. 2026-10-10 12:38 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-10 12:38 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  13. 2026-10-09 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-09 05:18 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  16. 2026-10-08 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-08 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 03:48 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-07 03:48 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  22. 2026-10-06 02:51 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-06 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  25. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-04 20:42 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-03 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-03 16:32 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  5. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  6. 2026-10-02 08:26 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-02 08:26 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  9. 2026-10-01 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-01 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  12. 2026-09-30 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-30 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  15. 2026-09-29 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-29 01:51 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  18. 2026-09-28 01:14 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-28 01:14 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  21. 2026-09-27 00:37 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-27 00:37 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  24. 2026-09-25 12:41 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-25 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  27. 2026-09-24 12:04 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  29. 2026-09-23 11:26 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-22 10:48 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-21 10:11 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  33. 2026-09-20 09:34 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-19 08:57 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  36. 2026-09-18 08:02 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  38. 2026-09-17 07:24 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  40. 2026-09-16 06:45 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  42. 2026-09-15 06:08 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  44. 2026-09-14 05:28 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  46. 2026-09-13 04:51 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-12 04:13 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  49. 2026-09-11 03:35 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  51. 2026-09-09 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  53. 2026-09-08 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  55. 2026-09-07 00:59 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  57. 2026-09-06 00:22 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-04 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  60. 2026-09-02 22:07 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  62. 2026-09-01 21:28 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  64. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  65. 2026-08-30 20:05 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  67. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  68. 2026-08-29 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  70. 2026-08-28 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx47-qxp5-mmh2 · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  71. 2026-08-27 18:04 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-27 18:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx47-qxp5-mmh2 · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  73. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  74. 2026-08-26 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-26 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx47-qxp5-mmh2 · GitHub CVSS 6.5

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-59230?
CVE-2026-59230 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 24, 2026. Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.17.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0. The camel-mail component ships a MimeMultipart data format that can unmarshal a MIME multipart message. When it is configured…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-59230 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-59230 was published on August 24, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-59230 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-59230 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-59230?
CVE-2026-59230 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-59230?
A fix for CVE-2026-59230 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-59230 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-59230

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-59230?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.