A flaw was found in Samba's CTDB, the clustered database service used by Samba. Insufficient integrity validation of received CTDB protocol packets allows malformed packets containing invalid field lengths, improperly terminated strings, or inconsistent packet sizes to be processed without adequate bounds checking. A remote attacker with access to the CTDB private network may trigger a denial of service through process crashes or excessive memory consumption and, in limited cases, disclose adjacent memory contents.
CVE-2026-58224
Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-14. A secondary CVSS source baseline 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 29EG Risk 29/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity65% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 23rd
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
August 14, 2026
Last Modified
September 23, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Aug 14, 2026Samba - Security Announcement Archive
https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2026-58224-advisory.html16085 – (CVE-2026-58224) [SECURITY] CVE-2026-58224: CTDB: heap OOB read via unchecked packet length fields
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160852502720 – (CVE-2026-58224) CVE-2026-58224 samba: CTDB fails to do integrity checking of received packets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2502720CVE-2026-58224 - Red Hat Customer Portal
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-58224Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-58224(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | winbind (2:4.23.6+dfsg-1ubuntu2.2) @ resolute | 2026-10-04 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | 2:4.17.10+dfsg-0+deb12u1 ... 2:4.25.0~rc1+dfsg-1 (177 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | 2:4.22.10+dfsg-0+deb13u1 ... 2:4.22.8+dfsg-0+deb13u2 (9 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| samba | 2:4.22.3+dfsg-4 ... 2:4.24.5+dfsg-1~bpo13+1 (34 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 95× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 189 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-04 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 19:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 19:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 19:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 07:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 07:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 07:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 21:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 21:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 10:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 10:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 09:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 09:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 09:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-24 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 17:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 17:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-23 14:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 14:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 20:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 20:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 20:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-21 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 16:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-21 16:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-20 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 15:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 15:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 13:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 13:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 12:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 12:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 12:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 11:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 11:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 10:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 10:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 10:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 09:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 09:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 08:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 08:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 08:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 08:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 08:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-12 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 07:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 07:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 07:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 07:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 07:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 07:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-09 06:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 06:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 06:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 06:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 06:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 06:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 05:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 05:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 05:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 01:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 01:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 01:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-05 01:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 01:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 01:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 01:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:12:samba
- CVE-2025-10230EG 10.0EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-1472EG 10.0 KEVEPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-0240EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2012-1182EG 10.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2007-2446EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2004-0882EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2004-1154EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2004-0600EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2003-0196EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2003-0201EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
Same vendor
4 shownubuntu:USN-8621-1
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-58224?
When was CVE-2026-58224 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-58224 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-58224?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-58224?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-58224
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-58224?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.