CVE-2026-57122

HIGHPre-NVD 8.68.6
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-77599 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-x92v-rpx6-p6cw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 8.6Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.6.59, the WhatsApp and Linear bot webhook handlers verify HMAC signatures only when WHATSAPP_APP_SECRET or LINEAR_WEBHOOK_SECRET is configured and otherwise parse and dispatch unsigned request bodies. A remote unauthenticated client that reaches the webhook route can forge messages, comments, or agent-session events, impersonate platform users, influence agent prompts and actions, and disrupt bot processing. This issue is fixed in 4.6.59.

CVSS v3
8.6
EG Score
8.6HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
54
EG Risk 54/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity86% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.6 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.6): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.6 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.6 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 18, 2026

Last Modified

September 15, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 14, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

PraisonAI v4.6.59

Patch available: MervinPraison/PraisonAI v4.6.59

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/releases/tag/v4.6.59
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 2adfe7e8323f (MervinPraison/PraisonAI)

Patch available: MervinPraison/PraisonAI v4.6.143 (contains commit 2adfe7e8323f)

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/2adfe7e8323f6deec66925cf15a885b6238895e9
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Webhook signature verification skipped (fail-open) when secret unset, allowing forged inbound webhooks (WhatsApp & Linear bots) · Advisory · MervinPraison/PraisonAI · GitHub

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-x92v-rpx6-p6cw

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-57122(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
praisonai0.0.1 ... 4.6.9 (749 versions)
  • every version up to 4.6.59: fixed in 4.6.59
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  6. 2026-10-23 18:30 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  8. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  9. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  11. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  12. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  13. 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  15. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  16. 2026-10-16 15:20 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  19. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  21. 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 16:53 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
Show 30 more
  1. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  2. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  3. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  4. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  5. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  6. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  7. 2026-10-05 07:18 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  9. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  10. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  11. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  12. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  13. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  14. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  15. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  16. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  17. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  19. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  22. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  24. 2026-09-14 19:24 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-14 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-14 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-07-30 22:31 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-07-26 18:44 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-07-23 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-07-20 21:33 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-57122?
CVE-2026-57122 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 18, 2026. PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 4.6.59, the WhatsApp and Linear bot webhook handlers verify HMAC signatures only when WHATSAPPAPPSECRET or LINEARWEBHOOKSECRET is configured and otherwise parse and dispatch unsigned request bodies. A remote unauthenticated client that reaches the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57122 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-57122 was published on June 18, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-57122 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-57122 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57122?
CVE-2026-57122 has a CVSS base score of 8.6 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57122?
A fix for CVE-2026-57122 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-57122 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-57122

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57122?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.