PraisonAI before 4.6.78 fails to validate the caller-controlled dimension argument in the PGVector and Cassandra knowledge-store create_collection() backends. Although schema, keyspace, and collection-name identifiers are validated, the dimension value (declared as int but not enforced at runtime) is interpolated directly into the vector column of the generated CREATE TABLE DDL. A caller able to influence collection-creation dimensions can pass a string such as '3); DROP TABLE tenant_secrets; --' to inject SQL/CQL tokens into the statement executed by the database driver.
CVE-2026-60090
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 75EG Risk 75/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 52nd
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 11, 2026
Last Modified
July 14, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 11, 2026PGVector and Cassandra knowledge stores interpolate vector dimensions into DDL · Advisory · MervinPraison/PraisonAI · GitHub
https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-wf65-4jjx-q444PraisonAI before 4.6.78 SQL/CQL Injection via vector dimension | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/praisonai-before-sql-cql-injection-via-vector-dimensioncommit 3aa9cbc2bd49 (MervinPraison/PraisonAI)
Patch available: MervinPraison/PraisonAI v4.6.149 (contains commit 3aa9cbc2bd49)
https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/3aa9cbc2bd49c23a32be0a89a5e620d13d843eabVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-60090(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| praisonai | 0.0.1 ... 4.6.9 (763 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 376 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 276 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-14 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-10-01 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 14:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-28 09:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 09:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-24 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-23 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-23 05:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-18 10:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-18 05:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 05:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-14 07:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-14 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-13 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 23:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-13 12:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-13 08:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 08:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-12 13:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-12 02:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 02:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-08 02:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-06 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-05 21:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 21:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-31 00:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-30 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-30 16:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-30 11:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-30 05:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 05:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-28 02:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-27 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 21:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-27 00:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 00:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-26 12:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-26 08:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-26 02:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-25 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-08-25 09:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-25 04:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-25 00:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-24 20:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 20:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-24 13:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-08-24 09:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q65p-7p84-495c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownPyPI:praisonai
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-60090?
When was CVE-2026-60090 made public?
Is CVE-2026-60090 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-60090?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-60090?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-60090
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-60090?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.