CVE-2026-55953

HIGHNVD 7.47.4—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.4 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (13th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.4Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

The Erlang/OTP ssl TLS 1.2 (and earlier) and DTLS client does not verify that the cipher suite selected by the server in ServerHello was among the suites offered by the client in ClientHello. The client-side tls_handshake:hello/5 handler validates the negotiated protocol version and the downgrade sentinel but hands the server-chosen suite directly to ssl_handshake:handle_server_hello_extensions/9, which installs it without a membership check. The TLS 1.3 client path performs this check (per RFC 8446), so it is not affected.

An on-path attacker between the client and the intended server can respond with a ServerHello selecting an anonymous key exchange suite such as TLS_DH_anon_* or TLS_ECDH_anon_* that the client never offered. Anonymous suites do not require the server to present a certificate, so the entire verify_peer and cacerts configuration is bypassed: the attacker completes the handshake with its own ephemeral parameters, no certificate is validated, no hostname is checked, and ssl:connect returns {ok, Socket}. All subsequent application traffic is readable and modifiable by the attacker.

This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.15, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.4, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.4, corresponding to ssl from 5.3.4 before 11.2.12.11, from 11.3 before 11.6.0.4, and from 11.7 before 11.7.4. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to ssl before 5.3.4, is affected is unknown.

CVSS v3
7.4
EG Score
7.4HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
33
EG Risk 33/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity74% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
13th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

July 27, 2026

Last Modified

September 8, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Aug 1, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
generic

Versions — Erlang System Documentation v29.0.4

https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions
generic

OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities

https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-55953
githubMentions a patch (unverified)

(D)TLS-1.2 Server Cert Verification Bypass via Unoffered Anonymous Cipher Suite · Advisory · erlang/otp · GitHub

https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c6cw-pr89-w882
github_commit

commit e6ff938116b2 (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit e6ff938116b2 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/e6ff938116b2872bccc478af7fefb56627285b77
github_commit

commit 0a82596d425a (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit 0a82596d425a — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/0a82596d425abe43dc2e0b3d74aa1557ef74051c
github_commit

commit 064e23641461 (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit 064e23641461 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/064e236414614f9085cbbbd6eacf0e43c02d1b4b
generic

TLS 1.2 and DTLS client accepts unoffered anonymous cipher suite, bypassing server authentication | Erlang Ecosystem Foundation CNA

https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-55953.html

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuerlang-xmerl (1:25.3.2.8+dfsg-1ubuntu4.7) @ noble2026-10-07ubuntu
redhaterlang27-main-27.3.4.15-0.1.hum12026-07-28redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
erlang1:23.2.6+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (117 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
erlang1:25.2.3+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.1.1+dfsg-1 (80 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
erlang1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1, 1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u1, 1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u2
  • every version up to 1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u3: fixed in 1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb13u3
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
erlang1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 1:29.0.4+dfsg-1: fixed in 1:29.0.4+dfsg-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 66× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 272 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-07 02:28 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-07 02:28 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-10-04 07:18 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-04 07:18 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-10-02 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-02 18:28 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-10-01 03:52 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-01 03:52 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-29 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-29 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-28 03:52 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-28 03:52 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-25 06:53 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-25 06:53 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-24 00:24 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-24 00:24 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-23 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-22 21:49 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-22 21:49 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-20 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-20 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-19 08:17 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-19 08:17 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-18 18:54 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-18 02:24 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-18 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-17 01:46 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-17 01:46 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-16 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-16 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-09-15 09:09 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-15 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-09-14 10:14 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-13 20:58 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-13 20:58 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-09-13 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-12 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-12 18:19 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-12 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-11 15:53 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-11 15:53 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-09-10 21:30 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-10 21:30 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-09-10 08:16 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-09 08:20 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-09 08:20 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-09-08 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-08 01:16 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-07 21:03 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-07 21:03 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-09-06 23:28 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-06 23:28 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-09-06 08:27 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-05 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-05 19:15 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-05 05:45 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-05 05:45 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-04 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-04 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-09-01 22:58 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-01 22:58 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-31 02:19 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-31 02:19 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-08-30 13:06 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-30 13:06 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-55953?
CVE-2026-55953 is a high vulnerability published on July 27, 2026. The Erlang/OTP ssl TLS 1.2 (and earlier) and DTLS client does not verify that the cipher suite selected by the server in ServerHello was among the suites offered by the client in ClientHello. The client-side tlshandshake:hello/5 handler validates the negotiated protocol version and the downgrade…
When was CVE-2026-55953 disclosed?
CVE-2026-55953 was first published on July 27, 2026, with the most recent update on September 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-55953 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-55953 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (13th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55953?
CVE-2026-55953 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.4 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55953?
A fix for CVE-2026-55953 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-55953 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55953

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55953?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.