CVE-2026-55953

HIGHNVD 7.47.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.4 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 86% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.4Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

The Erlang/OTP ssl TLS 1.2 (and earlier) and DTLS client does not verify that the cipher suite selected by the server in ServerHello was among the suites offered by the client in ClientHello. The client-side tls_handshake:hello/5 handler validates the negotiated protocol version and the downgrade sentinel but hands the server-chosen suite directly to ssl_handshake:handle_server_hello_extensions/9, which installs it without a membership check. The TLS 1.3 client path performs this check (per RFC 8446), so it is not affected.

An on-path attacker between the client and the intended server can respond with a ServerHello selecting an anonymous key exchange suite such as TLS_DH_anon_* or TLS_ECDH_anon_* that the client never offered. Anonymous suites do not require the server to present a certificate, so the entire verify_peer and cacerts configuration is bypassed: the attacker completes the handshake with its own ephemeral parameters, no certificate is validated, no hostname is checked, and ssl:connect returns {ok, Socket}. All subsequent application traffic is readable and modifiable by the attacker.

This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.15, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.4, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.4, corresponding to ssl from 5.3.4 before 11.2.12.11, from 11.3 before 11.6.0.4, and from 11.7 before 11.7.4. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to ssl before 5.3.4, is affected is unknown.

CVSS v3
7.4
EG Score
7.4(medium)
EG Risk
33(Track)
EG Risk 33/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity74% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
14%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 27, 2026

Last Modified

August 25, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Aug 1, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
generic

Versions — Erlang System Documentation v29.0.4

https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versions
generic

OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities

https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-55953
github Patch Available

(D)TLS-1.2 Server Cert Verification Bypass via Unoffered Anonymous Cipher Suite · Advisory · erlang/otp · GitHub

https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-c6cw-pr89-w882
github_commit

commit e6ff938116b2 (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit e6ff938116b2 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/e6ff938116b2872bccc478af7fefb56627285b77
github_commit

commit 0a82596d425a (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit 0a82596d425a — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/0a82596d425abe43dc2e0b3d74aa1557ef74051c
github_commit

commit 064e23641461 (erlang/otp)

Fix landed in erlang/otp commit 064e23641461 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/064e236414614f9085cbbbd6eacf0e43c02d1b4b
generic

TLS 1.2 and DTLS client accepts unoffered anonymous cipher suite, bypassing server authentication | Erlang Ecosystem Foundation CNA

https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-55953.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-55953(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhaterlang27-main-27.3.4.15-0.1.hum12026-07-28redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
erlang1:23.2.6+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (117 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
erlang1:25.2.3+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (78 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
erlang1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (38 versions)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
erlang1:27.3.4.1+dfsg-1 ... 1:29.0~rc3+dfsg-4 (35 versions)1:29.0.4+dfsg-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 161× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 161 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-25 23:36 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-25 14:36 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-25 14:36 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-25 01:22 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-25 01:22 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-24 12:09 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-24 12:09 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-23 22:56 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-23 09:36 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-23 09:36 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-22 20:23 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-22 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-22 07:10 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-21 17:57 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-21 04:44 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-21 04:44 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-20 15:32 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-20 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-20 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-19 12:55 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-18 23:43 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-18 23:43 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-18 10:30 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-17 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-17 21:17 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-17 08:03 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-16 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-16 18:51 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-16 05:28 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-16 05:28 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-15 16:16 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-15 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-15 03:03 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-14 13:50 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-14 00:38 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-14 00:38 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-13 11:25 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-12 22:13 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-12 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-12 09:00 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-11 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-11 19:48 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-11 06:36 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-11 06:36 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-10 17:23 UTCEG score recompute 1.70
  34. 2026-08-10 17:23 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-10 17:21 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 7.4 · severity → HIGH
  36. 2026-08-10 14:39 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-10 11:01 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-10 07:22 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-10 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-10 00:05 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-09 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-09 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-09 16:49 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-09 13:11 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-09 09:33 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-09 05:55 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-09 02:17 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-08 22:39 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-08 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-08 19:01 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-08-08 15:23 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-08 11:44 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-08 08:06 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-08 04:28 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-08 00:50 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-07 21:12 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-07 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-07 17:34 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-07 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-07 10:18 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-07 06:40 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-07 03:02 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-06 23:23 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-06 19:45 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-06 16:07 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-06 16:07 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-06 12:29 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-06 08:50 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-06 05:12 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-06 01:34 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-05 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-05 21:56 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-55953?
CVE-2026-55953 is a high vulnerability published on July 27, 2026. The Erlang/OTP ssl TLS 1.2 (and earlier) and DTLS client does not verify that the cipher suite selected by the server in ServerHello was among the suites offered by the client in ClientHello. The client-side tlshandshake:hello/5 handler validates the negotiated protocol version and the downgrade…
When was CVE-2026-55953 disclosed?
CVE-2026-55953 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 27, 2026, with the most recent update on August 25, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-55953 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-55953 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 86.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55953?
CVE-2026-55953 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.4 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55953?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-55953, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55953

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55953?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.