CVE-2026-53941

MEDIUMCVSS · not yet scored
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Uprobe gadgets: unprivileged container's ld.so.cache causes high CPU utilization and container startup DoS

Summary

An unprivileged container can block all other containers from starting on the same host by placing a crafted /etc/ld.so.cache file in its filesystem. When Inspektor Gadget attaches any uprobe-based gadget, it parses this file in the container startup path. A malicious cache causes ~53 seconds of CPU burn, during which Docker cannot start any other container. No special capabilities are required.

Severity

To be assessed — Availability impact, no confidentiality or integrity impact.

Affected Versions

All versions of Inspektor Gadget that support uprobe-based gadgets (trace_malloc, trace_open, trace_ssl, trace_grpc, etc.).

Description

When Inspektor Gadget attaches uprobe-based gadgets to containers, it resolves library paths by parsing the container's /etc/ld.so.cache file (pkg/uprobetracer/ldcache_parser.go). This file is fully controlled by the container.

The parser has three vulnerabilities:

  • Quadratic string building (pkg/uprobetracer/bytes.go:36-44): The readStringFromBytes function concatenates one byte at a time (res += string(data[i])), which is O(n²) in Go due to string immutability. With a 16MB cache file containing large regions without null terminators, this causes massive CPU and memory churn.
  • Insufficient entry count validation (pkg/uprobetracer/ldcache_parser.go:120): The EntryCount field is read directly from the untrusted file. While a per-entry bounds check prevents out-of-bounds access, the loop still iterates up to (fileSize - headerSize) / entrySize ≈ 700,000 times, calling readStringFromBytes on each iteration.
  • Integer overflow in format detection (pkg/uprobetracer/ldcache_parser.go:174): The cache1Len computation uses uint32 arithmetic (ldCache1Size + cache1.EntryCount*ldCache1EntrySize). With a crafted EntryCount, this overflows and produces a small value, causing the parser to misidentify the cache format.

Combined, these cause ~53 seconds of CPU burn per container attachment when a crafted 16MB /etc/ld.so.cache is present.

Impact

  • Container runtime DoS: IG uses fanotify hooks (pkg/container-hook) to pause container startup until uprobe attachment completes. While IG is blocked processing the malicious cache, this pause is held, and Docker serializes container starts — meaning no other container can start on the host until IG finishes. This effectively causes a denial of service on the entire container runtime, not just on IG itself.
  • Container startup delay: When any uprobe-based gadget is running (trace_malloc, trace_ssl, etc.), starting a container with a crafted ld.so.cache delays startup by ~1 minute.
  • Monitoring degradation: The IG daemon is blocked processing the malicious cache, potentially missing events from other containers.
  • Amplification: Multiple containers with crafted caches can be started simultaneously to amplify the effect.
  • No special privileges required: Any container can include a crafted /etc/ld.so.cache in its image, mount one via a volume, or overwrite it at runtime before IG starts a uprobe gadget. In this last case, IG inspects all already-running containers when the gadget starts — this still burns CPU but does not block other containers from starting (since the fanotify pause only applies to new container starts).

Root Cause Analysis

In pkg/uprobetracer/ldcache_parser.go, the function readCacheFormat2 is called with the full file content:

for i := uint32(0); i < ldCache.EntryCount; i++ {
    entryOffset := ldEntriesOffset + i*ldCache2EntrySize
    if uint32(len(data)) <= entryOffset+ldCache2EntrySize {
        return nil  // bounds check stops iteration
    }
    // ... reads entry ...
    key := readStringFromBytes(data, keyOffset)    // O(n²) per call
    value := readStringFromBytes(data, valueOffset) // O(n²) per call
}

The per-entry bounds check correctly prevents out-of-bounds access, but:

  • The loop iterates ~700K times (limited by file size, not EntryCount)
  • Each readStringFromBytes call uses quadratic string concatenation

In pkg/uprobetracer/bytes.go:

func readStringFromBytes(data []byte, startPos uint32) string {
    res := ""
    for i := startPos; i < uint32(len(data)); i++ {
        if data[i] == 0 {
            return res
        }
        res += string(data[i])  // O(n²) — allocates new string each iteration
    }
    return ""
}

Note on Slice Bounds Checks

The code also performs slice accesses without proper bounds checks (e.g., data[:len(cache2Header)] when data may be shorter than 20 bytes, and ldCacheFile[:len(cache1Header)] when the file may be shorter than 11 bytes).

In practice, a malicious container cannot currently trigger a panic from these missing checks. This is because Go's io.ReadAll (used to read the file) always returns slices with cap >= 512 due to its initial buffer allocation (make([]byte, 0, 512) in Go's standard library). In Go, s[:n] only panics when n > cap(s), not when n > len(s). Since both header lengths (11 and 20) are well below 512, the slice expressions succeed — they simply read zero bytes beyond len, which don't match any valid header magic.

However, this relies on an undocumented implementation detail of io.ReadAll which could change in future Go versions. The bounds checks are still necessary for correctness and defense in depth.

CVSS v3
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
EG Risk
EPSS PROB
EPSS %ILE
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 19, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53941(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 1× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-19 19:42 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(3)

What is CVE-2026-53941?
CVE-2026-53941 is a medium vulnerability published on August 19, 2026. Uprobe gadgets: unprivileged container's ld.so.cache causes high CPU utilization and container startup DoS Summary An unprivileged container can block all other containers from starting on the same host by placing a crafted /etc/ld.so.cache file in its filesystem. When Inspektor Gadget attaches any…
When was CVE-2026-53941 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53941 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 19, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53941?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53941, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53941

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53941?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.