CVE-2026-53752

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

docx4j: Stack Overflow via Cyclic w:basedOn Style Chain leads to Denial of Service

Summary

docx4j's PropertyResolver and several adjacent helpers recursively walk the OpenXML style inheritance chain (w:basedOn) without cycle detection.

A WordprocessingML document containing a cyclic style chain (for example, Style A based on B and Style B based on A) causes unbounded recursion and a java.lang.StackOverflowError within the property-resolution code path.

These helpers are used by operations that require effective style resolution, including common conversion and TOC-related paths. As a result, most server-side pipelines that accept a user-supplied docx and process it through docx4j can likely be crashed by a file containing a cyclic style reference.

Details

Representative snippet: PropertyResolver.fillPPrStack

private void fillPPrStack(String styleId, Stack pPrStack) {
    Style style = liveStyles.get(styleId);
    ...
    // if it is based on, recurse
    if (style.getBasedOn() == null) {
        log.debug("Style " + styleId + " is a root style.");
    } else if (style.getBasedOn().getVal() != null) {
        String basedOnStyleName = style.getBasedOn().getVal();
        fillPPrStack(basedOnStyleName, pPrStack);   // ← unbounded recursion
        ...

Impact

This is a denial of service against a server-side application that processes untrusted docx files via docx4j.

An upload causes the processing thread to be terminated with StackOverflowError which may crash the worker thread, degrade the thread pool, or evade normal per-request CPU and heap-memory safeguards in containers and serverless functions (because the failure mode is thread-stack exhaustion rather than gradual resource consumption).

The attack depends on the host application's access controls and requires no user interaction beyond submitting the file. Detection is difficult because the file is a well-formed OOXML package containing ordinary style elements, and passes standard antivirus and content-inspection rules.

Severity: High for server-side applications that process untrusted DOCX files using docx4j style/property resolution (unless the application catches StackOverflowError, isolates conversion in disposable worker processes, restarts workers cleanly, and the practical impact is only failure of one request). Severity may be Medium where document upload requires authentication, processing is isolated, or the failure is limited to a single request/worker.

Credits

Thanks to Koh You Liang (@Isopach) for responsibly disclosing this issue.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(low)
EG Risk
38(Track)
EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
EPSS %ILE
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 17, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53752(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 1× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-17 22:02 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-53752?
CVE-2026-53752 is a high vulnerability published on August 17, 2026. docx4j: Stack Overflow via Cyclic w:basedOn Style Chain leads to Denial of Service Summary docx4j's PropertyResolver and several adjacent helpers recursively walk the OpenXML style inheritance chain (w:basedOn) without cycle detection. A WordprocessingML document containing a cyclic style chain…
When was CVE-2026-53752 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53752 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53752?
CVE-2026-53752 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.5 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53752?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53752, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53752

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53752?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.