CVE-2026-53265

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-25. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

dm cache policy smq: check allocation under invalidate lock

commit 2d1f7b65f5de ("dm cache policy smq: fix missing locks in invalidating cache blocks") added mq->lock around the destructive part of smq_invalidate_mapping(), but left the e->allocated check outside the critical section.

That leaves a check-then-act race. Two concurrent invalidators can both observe e->allocated as true before either of them takes mq->lock. The first invalidator that acquires the lock removes the entry from the queues and hash table and then calls free_entry(), which clears e->allocated and puts the entry back on the free list. The second invalidator can then acquire mq->lock and continue with the stale result of the unlocked check.

This can corrupt the SMQ queues or hash table by deleting an entry that is no longer on those structures. It can also hit the allocation check in free_entry() when the same entry is freed again.

Move the allocation check under mq->lock so the predicate and the destructive operations are serialized by the same lock.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EPSS
2.9%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

June 30, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

dm cache policy smq: check allocation under invalidate lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d886945fcb0f8c9dc6b39928d7a96c95c587346c
generic

dm cache policy smq: check allocation under invalidate lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3f0a606b9f278ece8a0df626ded9c4044071235
generic

dm cache policy smq: check allocation under invalidate lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c57570fba24016ec25ec046ab44db39143fb7a64
generic

dm cache policy smq: check allocation under invalidate lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c242c7af2aecf0b538b8623bdb86b8b441da38d9
generic

dm cache policy smq: check allocation under invalidate lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4892561552d671bd8c4da5ebb70e9fbb1ec446e
generic

dm cache policy smq: check allocation under invalidate lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/42ff6774ecd9d7f70d599cb71ff64373a1da4948
generic

dm cache policy smq: check allocation under invalidate lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/13da856c86fb8c2ccab95034fd77da1bb2c2a17c
generic

dm cache policy smq: check allocation under invalidate lock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/03ffe1112ed88bb3a9bd0b971549bf4d64bfc59a

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53265(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 55× in last 7d / 77× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-07 00:09 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-07 00:09 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-07-07 00:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 13:18 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-06 13:18 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-07-06 13:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 02:00 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-07-06 02:00 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-07-06 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-07-05 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-07-05 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-07-05 15:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-07-05 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-07-05 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-07-05 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-07-04 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-04 17:22 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-07-04 17:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCEG score recompute
Show 52 more
  1. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-07-04 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-03 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-03 19:33 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-07-03 19:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-07-03 08:42 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-03 08:42 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-07-03 08:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-02 21:50 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-07-02 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-07-02 21:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-07-02 10:59 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-02 10:59 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-07-02 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-07-01 23:50 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-07-01 23:50 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-07-01 23:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-07-01 12:59 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-07-01 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-07-01 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-07-01 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-01 02:08 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-07-01 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-30 15:16 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-06-30 15:16 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-06-30 15:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-06-30 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-06-30 04:23 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-06-30 04:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-06-29 17:32 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-06-29 17:32 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-06-29 17:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-29 06:40 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-06-29 06:40 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-06-29 06:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-06-28 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-06-28 19:48 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-06-28 19:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-28 08:56 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  44. 2026-06-28 08:56 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-06-28 08:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-06-28 07:52 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  47. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-25 10:03 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-06-25 10:03 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53265?
CVE-2026-53265 is a high vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm cache policy smq: check allocation under invalidate lock commit 2d1f7b65f5de ("dm cache policy smq: fix missing locks in invalidating cache blocks") added mq->lock around the destructive part of smqinvalidatemapping(), but left…
When was CVE-2026-53265 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53265 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on June 30, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53265 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53265 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.9% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53265?
CVE-2026-53265 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53265?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53265, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53265

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53265?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.