CVE-2026-53223

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-25. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: guard timestamp cmsgs to real error queue skbs

skb_is_err_queue() treats PACKET_OUTGOING as the sole marker for an skb from sk_error_queue. That assumption is not true for AF_PACKET sockets: outgoing packet taps are also delivered to packet sockets with skb->pkt_type == PACKET_OUTGOING, but their skb->cb is owned by AF_PACKET instead of struct sock_exterr_skb.

If such an skb is received with timestamping enabled, the generic timestamp cmsg path can read AF_PACKET control-buffer state as sock_exterr_skb::opt_stats. With SO_RXQ_OVFL enabled, the packet drop counter overlaps opt_stats. An odd drop count makes the path emit SCM_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_STATS with skb->len and skb->data. For non-linear skbs this copies past the linear head and can trigger hardened usercopy or disclose adjacent heap contents.

Keep skb_is_err_queue() local to net/socket.c, but make it verify that the PACKET_OUTGOING marker is paired with the sock_rmem_free destructor installed by sock_queue_err_skb(). AF_PACKET receive skbs use normal receive ownership and no longer pass as error-queue skbs, while legitimate sk_error_queue entries keep the PACKET_OUTGOING marker and sock_rmem_free ownership.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1(medium)
EG Risk
37(Track)
EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 8, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jun 29, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net: guard timestamp cmsgs to real error queue skbs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb51a9ad3ceb01bc6c0fb608dbc856e03ee6f24a
generic

net: guard timestamp cmsgs to real error queue skbs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e0665b2a8e90bb08bd205062c75662b502d31797
generic

net: guard timestamp cmsgs to real error queue skbs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b903e9b5629ec8dd6db92174070045bf81ad7060
generic

net: guard timestamp cmsgs to real error queue skbs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ad9a0374ee6d11048e1f74cd5180bad58b9848b4
generic

net: guard timestamp cmsgs to real error queue skbs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/71ff5cdd5da61d0438e902aa0fd68c28bc901abe
generic

net: guard timestamp cmsgs to real error queue skbs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3dde4fb941fa5649ab809f6cd3e20e0c424a4e31
generic

net: guard timestamp cmsgs to real error queue skbs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/24a0d548d3a765cd4558224e4f8e06e14cba26e3
generic

net: guard timestamp cmsgs to real error queue skbs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ee90b77b727df903033db873c75caac5c27ec98

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53223(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-31.31) @ resolute2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1013.13) @ resolute2026-09-08ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-09-08ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)5.10.259-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.174-1~deb11u1 (20 versions)6.1.176-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (145 versions)7.0.13-1

All Vendor Advisories

(4)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 90× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 284 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-08 09:43 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-08 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-08 09:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-08 08:58 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-08 08:58 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-08 08:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-30 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-30 19:38 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-30 19:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-27 23:59 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-27 23:59 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-27 23:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-25 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-25 00:46 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-25 00:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-24 13:14 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-24 13:14 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-24 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-23 21:30 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-23 21:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-23 09:59 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-23 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-23 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-22 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-22 22:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-22 10:43 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-22 10:43 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-22 10:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-21 17:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-21 06:12 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-21 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-21 06:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-20 18:39 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-20 18:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-20 07:08 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-20 07:08 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-20 07:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-19 13:06 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-19 13:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-19 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-19 01:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-17 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-17 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-17 14:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-17 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-17 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-16 15:55 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-16 15:55 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-16 15:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-16 04:24 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-16 04:24 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-16 04:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-15 16:54 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-15 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-15 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-15 05:23 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-15 05:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-14 17:52 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-14 17:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-14 06:05 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-14 06:05 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-14 06:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-13 18:34 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-13 18:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-13 05:57 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-13 05:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-12 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-12 18:26 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-12 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-12 06:55 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-12 06:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-11 19:23 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-11 19:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-11 07:52 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-11 07:52 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53223?
CVE-2026-53223 is a high vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: guard timestamp cmsgs to real error queue skbs skbiserrqueue() treats PACKETOUTGOING as the sole marker for an skb from skerrorqueue. That assumption is not true for AF_PACKET sockets: outgoing packet taps are also delivered…
When was CVE-2026-53223 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53223 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on September 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53223 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53223 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53223?
CVE-2026-53223 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53223?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53223, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53223

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53223?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.