CVE-2026-53145

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-25. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/gem: Try to fix change_handle ioctl, attempt 4

[airlied: just added some comments on how to reenable] On-list because the cat is out of the bag and we're clearly not good enough to figure this out in private. The story thus far:

5e28b7b94408 ("drm: Set old handle to NULL before prime swap in change_handle") tried to fix a race condition between the gem_close and gem_change_handle ioctls, but got a few things wrong:

  • There's a confusion with the local variable handle, which is actually
the new handle, and so the two-stage trick was actually applied to the wrong idr slot. 7164d78559b0 ("drm/gem: fix race between change_handle and handle_delete") tried to fix that by adding yet another code block, but forgot to add the error handling. Which meant we now have two paths, both kinda wrong.
  • dc366607c41c ("drm: Replace old pointer to new idr") tried to apply
another fix, but inconsistently, again because of the handle confusion
  • this would be the right fix (kinda, somewhat, it's a mess) if we'd
do the two-stage approach for the new handle. Except that wasn't the intent of the original fix.

We also didn't have an igt merged for the original ioctl, which is a big no-go. This was attempted to address off-list in the original bugfix, and amd QA people claimed the bug was fixed now. Very clearly that's not the case. Here's my attempt to sort this out:

  • Rename the local variable to new_handle, the old aliasing with
args->handle is just too dangerously confusing.
  • Merge the gem obj lookup with the two-stage idr_replace so that we
avoid getting ourselves confused there.
  • This means we don't have a surplus temporary reference anymore, only
an inherited from the idr. A concurrent gem_close on the new_handle could steal that. Fix that with the same two-stage approach create_tail uses. This is a bit overkill as documented in the comment, but I also don't trust my ability to understand this all correctly, so go with the established pattern we have from other ioctls instead for maximum paranoia.
  • Adjust error paths. I've tried to make the error and success paths
common, because they are identical except for which handle is removed and on which we call idr_replace to (re)install the object again. But that made things messier to read, so I've left it at the more verbose version, which unfortunately hides the symmetry in the entire code flow a bit.
  • While at it, also replace the 7 space indent with 1 tab.

And finally, because I flat out don't trust my abilities here at all anymore:

  • Disable the ioctl until we have the igt situation and everything else
sorted out on-list and with full consensus.

v2:

Sashiko noticed that I didn't handle the error path for idr_replace correctly, it must be checked with IS_ERR_OR_NULL like in gem_handle_delete. So yeah, definitely should just the existing paths 1:1 because this is endless amounts of tricky.

Also add the Fixes: line for the original ioctl, I forgot that too.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EPSS
1.1%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

June 30, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

drm/gem: Try to fix change_handle ioctl, attempt 4 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0639ede2f24ac224b2079cd35ecd5fd8ad4e3cd
generic

drm/gem: Try to fix change_handle ioctl, attempt 4 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1d9b93df7fc768228906e24220591ec1cddad391
generic

drm/gem: Try to fix change_handle ioctl, attempt 4 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a4f03d22fb655e5f192244fb2c87d8066fcfca2

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53145(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 30× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-07 00:11 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-07 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-06 11:28 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-06 11:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-05 22:46 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-07-05 22:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-07-05 10:03 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-05 10:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-05 02:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-04 21:18 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-07-04 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-07-04 08:34 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-07-04 08:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-03 19:50 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-07-03 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-07-03 07:08 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-03 07:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-07-02 18:25 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-07-02 18:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-07-02 05:42 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-07-02 05:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-07-01 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
Show 17 more
  1. 2026-07-01 16:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-01 04:15 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  4. 2026-07-01 04:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-28 07:52 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  10. 2026-06-28 07:12 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-06-28 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-25 10:08 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-06-25 10:08 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53145?
CVE-2026-53145 is a high vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/gem: Try to fix change_handle ioctl, attempt 4 [airlied: just added some comments on how to reenable] On-list because the cat is out of the bag and we're clearly not good enough to figure this out in private. The story thus…
When was CVE-2026-53145 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53145 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on June 30, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53145 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53145 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.1% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53145?
CVE-2026-53145 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53145?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53145, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53145

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53145?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.