CVE-2026-53078

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-24. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Fix same-register dst/src OOB read and pointer leak in sock_ops

When a BPF sock_ops program accesses ctx fields with dst_reg == src_reg, the SOCK_OPS_GET_SK() and SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD() macros fail to zero the destination register in the !fullsock / !locked_tcp_sock path.

Both macros borrow a temporary register to check is_fullsock / is_locked_tcp_sock when dst_reg == src_reg, because dst_reg holds the ctx pointer. When the check is false (e.g., TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV state with a request_sock), dst_reg should be zeroed but is not, leaving the stale ctx pointer:

  • SOCK_OPS_GET_SK: dst_reg retains the ctx pointer, passes NULL checks
as PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL, and can be used as a bogus socket pointer, leading to stack-out-of-bounds access in helpers like bpf_skc_to_tcp6_sock().
  • SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD: dst_reg retains the ctx pointer which the
verifier believes is a SCALAR_VALUE, leaking a kernel pointer.

Fix both macros by:

  • Changing JMP_A(1) to JMP_A(2) in the fullsock path to skip the
added instruction.
  • Adding BPF_MOV64_IMM(si->dst_reg, 0) after the temp register
restore in the !fullsock path, placed after the restore because dst_reg == src_reg means we need src_reg intact to read ctx->temp.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 24, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

bpf: Fix same-register dst/src OOB read and pointer leak in sock_ops - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18e3ffde1822f0b48b1753bf34aa97ce839df1d8
generic

bpf: Fix same-register dst/src OOB read and pointer leak in sock_ops - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10f86a2a5c91fc4c4d001960f1c21abe52545ef6

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53078(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (350 versions)
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u16.12.101-1~deb12u1
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (499 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (32 versions)6.12.101-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (140 versions)7.0.10-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 87× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 255 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-30 19:55 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-30 19:55 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-30 19:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-28 03:45 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-28 03:45 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-28 03:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-25 01:21 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-25 01:21 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-25 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-24 13:37 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 13:37 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-24 13:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-23 23:12 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-23 23:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-23 11:03 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-23 11:03 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-23 11:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-22 23:20 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-22 23:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-22 11:35 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-22 11:35 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-22 11:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-21 19:07 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-21 19:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-21 07:16 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-21 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-21 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-20 19:05 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-20 19:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-20 07:22 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-20 07:22 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-20 07:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-19 13:49 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-19 13:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-19 02:04 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-19 02:04 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-19 02:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-17 07:51 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-17 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-16 20:08 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-16 20:08 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-16 20:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-16 08:25 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-16 08:25 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-16 08:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-15 20:42 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-15 20:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-15 08:39 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-15 08:39 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-15 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-14 20:15 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-14 20:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-14 08:32 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-14 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-14 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-13 20:49 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-13 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-13 09:06 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-13 09:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-12 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-12 21:23 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-12 21:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-08-12 09:38 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-12 09:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-11 21:55 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-11 21:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-11 10:12 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-11 10:12 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-11 10:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-08-10 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-10 22:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-10 10:46 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-10 10:46 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53078?
CVE-2026-53078 is a high vulnerability published on June 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix same-register dst/src OOB read and pointer leak in sock_ops When a BPF sockops program accesses ctx fields with dstreg == src_reg, the SOCKOPSGETSK() and SOCKOPSGETFIELD() macros fail to zero the destination register in…
When was CVE-2026-53078 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53078 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 24, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53078 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53078 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53078?
CVE-2026-53078 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53078?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53078, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53078

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53078?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.