In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu/vt-d: Fix oops due to out of scope access
Below oops triggers when kill QEMU process:
Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x7fffffff844eaaa7: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
Call Trace:
do_raw_spin_lock+0xaa/0xc0
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x21/0x40
domain_remove_dev_pasid+0x52/0x160
intel_nested_set_dev_pasid+0x1b9/0x1e0
__iommu_set_group_pasid+0x56/0x120
pci_dev_reset_iommu_done+0xe3/0x180
pcie_flr+0x65/0x160
__pci_reset_function_locked+0x5b/0x120
vfio_pci_core_close_device+0x63/0xe0 [vfio_pci_core]
vfio_df_close+0x4f/0xa0
vfio_df_unbind_iommufd+0x2d/0x60
vfio_device_fops_release+0x3e/0x40
__fput+0xe5/0x2c0
task_work_run+0x58/0xa0
do_exit+0x2c8/0x600
do_group_exit+0x2f/0xa0
get_signal+0x863/0x8c0
arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x24/0x100
exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x87/0x380
do_syscall_64+0x2ff/0x11e0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
The global static blocked domain is a dummy domain without corresponding
dmar_domain structure, accessing beyond iommu_domain structure triggers
oops easily. Fix it by return early in domain_remove_dev_pasid() like
identity domain.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it