CVE-2026-52947

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-24. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove

In qrtr_port_remove(), the socket reference count is decremented via __sock_put() before the port is removed from the qrtr_ports XArray and before the RCU grace period elapses.

This breaks the fundamental RCU update paradigm. It exposes a race window where a concurrent RCU reader (such as qrtr_reset_ports() or qrtr_port_lookup()) can obtain a pointer to the socket from the XArray, and attempt to call sock_hold() on a socket whose reference count has already dropped to zero.

This exact race condition was hit during syzkaller fuzzing, leading to the following refcount saturation warning and a potential Use-After-Free:

refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory. WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1273 at lib/refcount.c:22 refcount_warn_saturate+0xae/0x1d0 Modules linked in: qrtr(+) bochs drm_shmem_helper ... Call Trace: qrtr_reset_ports net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:768 [inline] [qrtr] __qrtr_bind.isra.0+0x48b/0x570 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:805 [qrtr] qrtr_bind+0x17d/0x210 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:901 [qrtr] kernel_bind+0xe4/0x120 net/socket.c:3592 qrtr_ns_init+0x1a6/0x380 net/qrtr/ns.c:715 [qrtr] qrtr_proto_init+0x3b/0xff0 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:169 [qrtr] do_one_initcall+0xf5/0x5e0 init/main.c:1283 ...

Fix this by deferring the reference count decrement until after the xa_erase() and the synchronize_rcu() complete.

(Note: The v1 of this patch incorrectly replaced __sock_put() with sock_put(). As Simon Horman pointed out, the callers of qrtr_port_remove() still hold a reference to the socket, so freeing the socket memory here would lead to a subsequent UAF in the caller. Thus, the __sock_put() is kept, but only repositioned to close the RCU race.)

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 24, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab269990ed58143a92a263be1bee626d82ac03da
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2171131ecda1ed61a594a1eb715e75fdad0fef5
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7de2d447072be3b1a76793f034432338fc9c494b
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/474293d90880622fde9d2430fb0165767090f7b3
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b20ec8f31e8a6a6782243f473b0abd3463621df
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2aa4c12723fe432e623462a3be42a197a128722b
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2047c2aa0963bb2872fd722300a15bcb441a4c00
generic

net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtr_port_remove - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/03bfa95e452e2b6ccd76a332060ae4feaf5ad84d

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)5.10.259-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.174-1~deb11u1 (20 versions)6.1.176-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (145 versions)7.0.13-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 82× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 289 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-30 20:19 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-30 20:19 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-30 20:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-28 04:49 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-28 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-28 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 01:48 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-25 01:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-24 13:46 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-24 13:46 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-24 13:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-24 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-23 13:27 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-23 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-23 01:10 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-23 01:10 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-23 01:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-22 13:10 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-22 13:10 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-22 13:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-21 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-21 07:34 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-21 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-21 07:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-20 19:34 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-20 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-20 07:34 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-20 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-20 07:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-19 14:16 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-19 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-19 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-19 02:16 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-19 02:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-17 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-17 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-17 02:10 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-17 02:10 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-17 02:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-16 14:10 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-16 14:10 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-16 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-16 02:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-15 14:10 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-15 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-15 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-15 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-15 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-08-14 14:09 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-14 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-14 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-14 02:08 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-14 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-13 14:08 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-13 14:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-13 02:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-12 14:05 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-12 14:05 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-12 14:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-12 02:00 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-12 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-11 14:00 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-11 14:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-11 02:00 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-11 02:00 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-11 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-10 14:00 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-10 14:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-10 01:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-09 13:59 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-09 13:59 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-09 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-52947?
CVE-2026-52947 is a high vulnerability published on June 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: qrtr: fix refcount saturation and potential UAF in qrtrportremove In qrtrportremove(), the socket reference count is decremented via sockput() before the port is removed from the qrtrports XArray and before the RCU grace…
When was CVE-2026-52947 disclosed?
CVE-2026-52947 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 24, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-52947 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-52947 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-52947?
CVE-2026-52947 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52947?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-52947, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-52947

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52947?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.