CVE-2026-52971

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-24. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: ena: PHC: Fix potential use-after-free in get_timestamp

Move the phc->active check and resp pointer assignment to after acquiring the spinlock. Previously, phc->active was checked without holding the lock, and resp was cached from ena_dev->phc.virt_addr before the lock was acquired.

If ena_com_phc_destroy() runs between the lockless active check and the lock acquisition, it sets active=false, releases the lock, frees the DMA memory, and sets virt_addr=NULL. The get_timestamp path would then read a NULL virt_addr and dereference it.

With both the active check and the pointer read under the lock, destroy cannot free the memory while get_timestamp is using it.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EPSS
3.1%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 24, 2026

Last Modified

June 28, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net: ena: PHC: Fix potential use-after-free in get_timestamp - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e42c755582f0960e684298762f0ab927b3778376
generic

net: ena: PHC: Fix potential use-after-free in get_timestamp - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca9ed40f28949353911dcb524ff8fff2f3409c97
generic

net: ena: PHC: Fix potential use-after-free in get_timestamp - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/95e8ae9af2a61b4e72f5c585bf4c7d8aaf2a2c98

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-52971(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 30× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-06 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-06 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-06 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-06 06:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-05 17:44 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-05 17:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-05 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-07-05 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-07-05 02:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-04 17:26 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-07-04 17:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-04 05:20 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-07-04 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-07-03 17:12 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-07-03 17:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-07-03 05:05 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-03 05:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-07-02 16:53 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-07-02 16:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-07-02 04:46 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-07-02 04:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 17 more
  1. 2026-07-01 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-01 16:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-01 04:33 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  4. 2026-07-01 04:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-28 07:52 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  10. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-27 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-06-27 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-24 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-06-24 18:02 UTCNVD updatefirst tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-52971?
CVE-2026-52971 is a high vulnerability published on June 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ena: PHC: Fix potential use-after-free in get_timestamp Move the phc->active check and resp pointer assignment to after acquiring the spinlock. Previously, phc->active was checked without holding the lock, and resp was cached…
When was CVE-2026-52971 disclosed?
CVE-2026-52971 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 24, 2026, with the most recent update on June 28, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-52971 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-52971 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 3.1% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-52971?
CVE-2026-52971 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52971?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-52971, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-52971

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52971?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.