CVE-2026-52935

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-24. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send

espintcp keeps a single in-flight transmit in ctx->partial. Before building a new sk_msg, espintcp_sendmsg() first tries to flush that state through espintcp_push_msgs().

For blocking callers, espintcp_push_msgs() may return success even when the previous partial send is still pending. espintcp_sendmsg() would then reinitialize emsg->skmsg and reuse ctx->partial while the old transfer still owns that state.

Do not rebuild the send message when ctx->partial is still in progress. If espintcp_push_msgs() returns with emsg->len still set, fail the new send instead of overwriting the live partial state.

This is a memory-safety fix: reusing the live partial-send state can leave a stale offset attached to a new sk_msg and lead to an out-of- bounds read in the send path.

tcp_sendmsg_locked() already handles waiting for send buffer memory, so the fix here is just to preserve espintcp's one-message-at-a-time transmit state.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EPSS
2.2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 24, 2026

Last Modified

June 28, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9b38a8fbfa07f1deaf7ee1eb38fa8b21ea13990
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c381039ade2e161ab08c0eda73c4f8b9a7115928
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba21439302db9a82fe4edbed1e38a97271529421
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aa82a078f70f7ff88ba7d1017134e79d1ac140f2
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8c6c691bf062dc0753a139a4ab8cb92a70fcf8f3
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6564e9c7af7e1dc7bfe7f3093b728abe484d7630
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/37487d55bf3300e3d2c1368da5c2bd3e3834ea4f
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1777ceac4bea5e568a5ad44b7f9bb219c1db21b6

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-52935(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 48× in last 7d / 61× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-07 04:13 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-07 04:13 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-07-07 04:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-06 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-06 15:46 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-07-06 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-06 03:17 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-07-06 03:17 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-07-06 03:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-07-05 14:45 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-05 14:45 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-07-05 14:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-05 02:09 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-07-05 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-07-05 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-07-04 13:43 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-04 13:43 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-07-04 13:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-04 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-07-04 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-07-04 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 36 more
  1. 2026-07-03 12:50 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-03 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-07-03 12:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-07-03 00:11 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-03 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-07-03 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-07-02 11:45 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-02 11:45 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-07-02 11:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-07-01 23:19 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-07-01 23:19 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-07-01 23:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-01 10:53 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-07-01 10:53 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-07-01 10:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-30 22:26 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-06-30 22:26 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-06-30 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-06-30 10:00 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  22. 2026-06-30 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-06-30 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-28 07:52 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  28. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-27 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-06-27 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-24 08:41 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-06-24 08:40 UTCNVD updatefirst tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-52935?
CVE-2026-52935 is a high vulnerability published on June 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send espintcp keeps a single in-flight transmit in ctx->partial. Before building a new skmsg, espintcpsendmsg() first tries to flush that state through espintcppushmsgs(). For…
When was CVE-2026-52935 disclosed?
CVE-2026-52935 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 24, 2026, with the most recent update on June 28, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-52935 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-52935 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.2% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-52935?
CVE-2026-52935 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52935?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-52935, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-52935

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52935?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.