CVE-2026-52935

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-24. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send

espintcp keeps a single in-flight transmit in ctx->partial. Before building a new sk_msg, espintcp_sendmsg() first tries to flush that state through espintcp_push_msgs().

For blocking callers, espintcp_push_msgs() may return success even when the previous partial send is still pending. espintcp_sendmsg() would then reinitialize emsg->skmsg and reuse ctx->partial while the old transfer still owns that state.

Do not rebuild the send message when ctx->partial is still in progress. If espintcp_push_msgs() returns with emsg->len still set, fail the new send instead of overwriting the live partial state.

This is a memory-safety fix: reusing the live partial-send state can leave a stale offset attached to a new sk_msg and lead to an out-of- bounds read in the send path.

tcp_sendmsg_locked() already handles waiting for send buffer memory, so the fix here is just to preserve espintcp's one-message-at-a-time transmit state.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 24, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jun 28, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9b38a8fbfa07f1deaf7ee1eb38fa8b21ea13990
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c381039ade2e161ab08c0eda73c4f8b9a7115928
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba21439302db9a82fe4edbed1e38a97271529421
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aa82a078f70f7ff88ba7d1017134e79d1ac140f2
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8c6c691bf062dc0753a139a4ab8cb92a70fcf8f3
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6564e9c7af7e1dc7bfe7f3093b728abe484d7630
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/37487d55bf3300e3d2c1368da5c2bd3e3834ea4f
generic

xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1777ceac4bea5e568a5ad44b7f9bb219c1db21b6

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-52935(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)5.10.259-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.174-1~deb11u1 (20 versions)6.1.176-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (145 versions)7.0.13-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 81× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 280 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-30 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-30 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-30 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-28 04:53 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-28 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-28 04:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-24 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-24 22:02 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-24 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-24 04:39 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 04:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-23 14:33 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-23 14:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-23 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-23 02:06 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-23 02:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-22 13:20 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-22 13:20 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-22 13:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-21 20:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-21 08:31 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-21 08:31 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-21 08:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-20 20:03 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-20 20:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-20 07:37 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-20 07:37 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-20 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-19 14:52 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-19 14:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-19 02:22 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-19 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-19 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-17 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-17 12:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-17 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-17 00:15 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-17 00:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-16 11:46 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-16 11:46 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-16 11:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-15 23:21 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-15 23:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-15 10:55 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-15 10:55 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-15 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-14 22:28 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-14 22:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-14 10:02 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-14 10:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-13 21:36 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-13 21:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-13 08:48 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-13 08:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-12 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-12 20:22 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-12 20:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-08-12 07:56 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-12 07:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-11 19:30 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-11 19:30 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-11 19:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-11 07:04 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-11 07:04 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-11 07:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-08-10 18:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-10 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-09 17:10 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-09 17:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-08-09 04:45 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-09 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-08-08 16:19 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-52935?
CVE-2026-52935 is a high vulnerability published on June 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: espintcp: do not reuse an in-progress partial send espintcp keeps a single in-flight transmit in ctx->partial. Before building a new skmsg, espintcpsendmsg() first tries to flush that state through espintcppushmsgs(). For…
When was CVE-2026-52935 disclosed?
CVE-2026-52935 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 24, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-52935 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-52935 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 92.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-52935?
CVE-2026-52935 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52935?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-52935, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-52935

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52935?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.