Compliance-trestle (Trestle) is a tooling platform for managing compliance as code. In versions before 3.12.4 and versions 4.0.0 through 4.0.3, the URLSecurityValidator that guards trestle's remote-fetch paths against server-side request forgery can be bypassed to reach loopback, link-local, cloud-metadata, and internal network endpoints it was designed to block. The blocklist does not canonicalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 literals such as [::ffff:169.254.169.254], which resolve to IPv6Address objects that never match the blocked IPv4 ranges, and it does not block the unspecified address 0.0.0.0, which routes to local services on Linux and inside containers. An attacker who can supply or influence an OSCAL artifact that trestle fetches, such as a malicious profile whose imports reference one of these bypass URLs, can cause the HTTPSFetcher and SFTPFetcher paths to contact cloud instance-metadata services, loopback interfaces, or internal hosts. This issue is fixed in versions 3.12.4 and 4.1.0.
CVE-2026-52776
This high-severity CVE scores 8.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (35th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.6
- EG Score
- 8.6HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 55EG Risk 55/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity86% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 35th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
August 12, 2026
Last Modified
September 9, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026commit d107cd16efe8 (oscal-compass/compliance-trestle)
Fix landed in oscal-compass/compliance-trestle commit d107cd16efe8 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/commit/d107cd16efe8eb15d46be3c1d97f1ec73d32447ccommit 5335ff873a2a (oscal-compass/compliance-trestle)
Fix landed in oscal-compass/compliance-trestle commit 5335ff873a2a — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/commit/5335ff873a2a68eb7de43df029bea09cadff22fdcompliance-trestle URLSecurityValidator SSRF allowlist bypass via IPv4-mapped IPv6 and 0.0.0.0 · Advisory · oscal-compass/compliance-trestle · GitHub
https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/security/advisories/GHSA-h47f-gmjp-m7rrVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-52776(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| compliance-trestle | 0.0.2 ... 4.0.3 (104 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 20:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 04:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 09:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-25 03:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-22 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 08:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-19 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
Show 44 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-18 22:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 00:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 00:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 12:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 13:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 00:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 15:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 17:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-09 05:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 16:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 22:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 00:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 23:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 22:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 11:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-31 05:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 07:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 08:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 23:25 UTCEG score recompute▲ 8.60
- 2026-08-25 23:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 8.6 · CVSS v4 → 8.6
- 2026-08-12 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
8 shownPyPI:compliance-trestle
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-52776?
When was CVE-2026-52776 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-52776 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-52776?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52776?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-52776
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52776?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.