In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.15.0 up to and including 1.25.1, the TLS server name used for DNS-over-TLS (DoT) forwarded queries is tied to a struct's ('serviced_query') lifetime but also referenced by another struct ('waiting_tcp'). When the owning struct is jostled out of the mesh while the DoT TCP stream is still handshaking it frees the storage behind the referenced string and if the TLS stream then errors out, it dereferences the freed pointer. The dereference is read-only and the practical impact is a daemon crash resulting in denial of service. A malicious actor that knows a DoT forwarding/stub Unbound's configuration could exploit the vulnerability by quering records in the appropriate zone while keeping Unbound uder pressure so that the jostle logic kicks in. If answers for the vulnerable zone are slow, the likelihood of jostling such queries is higher, although the timing of the jostle needs to be precise. Requirements for a vulnerable Unbound is the existence of a stub/forward zone configured for DoT together with a configured '#authname' suffix on the server identification. The connectivity to the server needs to exhibit a transient failure at the correct time in order to kick off the vulnerable error path.
CVE-2026-50046
Score 5.9 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-22. a secondary CVSS source baseline 5.9; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.9
- EG Score
- 5.9(medium)
- EG Risk
- 27(Track)EG Risk 27/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity59% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 15%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 22, 2026
Last Modified
July 24, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Jul 22, 2026Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-50046(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- CVE-2026-50046Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Medium
Possible heap use-after-free in an error path when a DoT forwarded query is jostled out
- GHSA-fg9v-m7xf-p865GitHub Security AdvisoriesMedium
In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.15.0 up to and including 1.25.1, the TLS server name used for DNS-over...
- RHSA-2026:43588Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | unbound-main-1.25.2-0.1.hum1 | 2026-07-22 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.24(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | — | 1.25.2-r0 | — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | 1.13.1-1 ... 1.25.2-1 (47 versions) | — | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | 1.17.1-2 ... 1.25.2-1 (23 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | 1.22.0-2 ... 1.25.2-1 (13 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | 1.22.0-2 ... 1.25.1-1 (9 versions) | 1.25.2-1 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 103× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 133 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 00:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 00:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 00:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 21:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 21:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 21:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 19:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 19:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 17:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 17:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-24 15:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 15:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-23 14:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 14:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-22 13:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 13:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-22 13:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 11:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 10:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 10:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 10:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 09:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 09:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 07:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 07:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 07:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 06:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 06:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 06:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 05:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 05:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 05:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 03:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 03:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 03:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 02:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 02:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-13 01:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 01:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 01:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 00:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 00:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 00:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 22:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 21:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 21:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 21:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 20:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 20:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 20:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-07 18:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 18:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 18:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-06 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 17:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 17:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 16:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-04 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-03 13:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-03 13:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-02 12:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-02 12:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-02 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 11:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-01 11:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-01 11:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-50046?
When was CVE-2026-50046 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-50046 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-50046?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-50046?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-50046
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-50046?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.