PyJWT is a JSON Web Token implementation in Python. Prior to 2.13.0, PyJWKClient passes its uri argument directly to urllib.request.urlopen() which uses Python stdlib's default OpenerDirector registering HTTPHandler, HTTPSHandler, FTPHandler, FileHandler, and DataHandler. There is currently no documented option to restrict which schemes PyJWKClient will fetch. If an application's jku URL ingestion path accepts attacker-influenced URLs (e.g., from JWT header, configuration file, OAuth flow parameter), the attacker can cause PyJWKClient to read arbitrary local files via file:// (SSRF on local filesystem), cause PyJWKClient to attempt FTP / data-URI fetches (broader SSRF surface), or forge tokens that PyJWT verifies as valid. The library does not directly return non-HTTP(S) URI contents to the attacker; the chained "plant a JWKS to forge tokens" scenario described in the original report requires additional application-layer flaws (attacker write access to a filesystem path, untrusted jku derivation) that this fix does not address. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.13.0.
CVE-2026-48522
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This medium-severity CVE scores 4.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-32915 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-993g-76c3-p5m4 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 4.2
- EG Score
- 4.2MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 35EG Risk 35/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity42% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 12th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (4.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 4.2 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-25). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 28, 2026
Last Modified
October 26, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Jun 15, 2026PyJWKClient: missing scheme allowlist enables CVE-2024-21643-class SSRF + token forgery via file://, ftp://, data: schemes · Advisory · jpadilla/pyjwt · GitHub
https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/security/advisories/GHSA-993g-76c3-p5m4Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-48522(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- CVE-2026-48522Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Medium
PyJWKClient: missing scheme allowlist enables SSRF + token forgery via file://, ftp://, data: schemes
- GHSA-993g-76c3-p5m4GitHub Security AdvisoriesMedium
PyJWKClient: missing scheme allowlist enables CVE-2024-21643-class SSRF + token forgery via file://, ftp://, data: schemes
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | python3-jwt (1.7.1-2ubuntu2.1+esm2) @ focal | 2026-10-22 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| pyjwt | 2.10.1-1 ... 2.7.0-1 (13 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| pyjwt | 2.10.1-2 ... 2.15.1-1 (10 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| pyjwt | 2.10.1-2, 2.10.1-3, 2.10.1-4, 2.11.0-2, 2.12.1-1 |
| — |
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| pyjwt | 0.1.1 ... 2.9.0 (54 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 202 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 102 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-26 13:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-22 23:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 23:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:00 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-11 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-03 15:19 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-14 06:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 06:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-13 02:39 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-25 04:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 04:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 14:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 14:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-08-21 15:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-08-20 10:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 10:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-17 08:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 08:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-15 00:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 01:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 01:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-12 22:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-11 23:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 23:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 00:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
- 2026-08-09 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:12:pyjwt
Same vendor
3 shownubuntu:USN-8823-1
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-48522?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-48522 published?
Is CVE-2026-48522 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48522?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48522?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-48522
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48522?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.