vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to version 3.11.4, by combining Buffer.call.call({}.__lookupGetter__, Buffer, "__proto__"), Buffer.call.call({}.__lookupSetter__, Buffer, "__proto__"), and Node.js's ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE Error, the host's TypeError constructor can be obtained, which allows the escape from the sandbox. This allows attackers to run arbitrary code. This issue has been patched in version 3.11.4.
CVE-2026-47131
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 10.0 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 10.0
- EG Score
- 10.0CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 76EG Risk 76/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity100% × 45%The EG Score, 10.0 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 50th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 29, 2026
Last Modified
June 13, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 13, 2026Sandbox Escape · Advisory · patriksimek/vm2 · GitHub
https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-v6mx-mf47-r5wgv3.11.4
Patch available: patriksimek/vm2 v3.11.4
https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/releases/tag/v3.11.4commit 27c525f4615e (patriksimek/vm2)
Patch available: patriksimek/vm2 v3.11.4 (contains commit 27c525f4615e)
https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/27c525f4615e2b983f122e2bed327d810126f5c8Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-47131(4)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:50850Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.1 security update
- RHSA-2026:36754Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.10.2 release.
- RHSA-2026:33574Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9.6 release.
- GHSA-v6mx-mf47-r5wgGitHub Security AdvisoriesCritical
vm2 has a Sandbox Escape issue
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:1785854226 | 2026-08-05 | redhat |
| redhat | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1783448184 | 2026-07-08 | redhat |
| redhat | rhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:1782761244 | 2026-06-30 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| vm2 | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 281 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 181 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-17 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 01:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-16 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 01:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
- 2026-10-14 20:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 20:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 15:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:48 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-14 06:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 06:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-13 01:06 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-25 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 21:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 17:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-22 00:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 00:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-21 20:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 07:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 01:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 01:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-20 21:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 17:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-17 14:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 14:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-17 10:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 06:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 15:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-16 09:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 06:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 02:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-15 18:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 02:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 02:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-08-14 22:31 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownnpm:vm2
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:33574
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-47131?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-47131 published?
Is CVE-2026-47131 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-47131?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-47131?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-47131
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-47131?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.