CVE-2026-46008

MEDIUMNVD 4.74.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 4.7 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-27. NVD baseline CVSS 4.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
4.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 4.7Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/damon/core: fix damos_walk() vs kdamond_fn() exit race

When kdamond_fn() main loop is finished, the function cancels remaining damos_walk() request and unset the damon_ctx->kdamond so that API callers and API functions themselves can show the context is terminated. damos_walk() adds the caller's request to the queue first. After that, it shows if the kdamond of the damon_ctx is still running (damon_ctx->kdamond is set). Only if the kdamond is running, damos_walk() starts waiting for the kdamond's handling of the newly added request.

The damos_walk() requests registration and damon_ctx->kdamond unset are protected by different mutexes, though. Hence, damos_walk() could race with damon_ctx->kdamond unset, and result in deadlocks.

For example, let's suppose kdamond successfully finished the damow_walk() request cancelling. Right after that, damos_walk() is called for the context. It registers the new request, and shows the context is still running, because damon_ctx->kdamond unset is not yet done. Hence the damos_walk() caller starts waiting for the handling of the request. However, the kdamond is already on the termination steps, so it never handles the new request. As a result, the damos_walk() caller thread infinitely waits.

Fix this by introducing another damon_ctx field, namely walk_control_obsolete. It is protected by the damon_ctx->walk_control_lock, which protects damos_walk() request registration. Initialize (unset) it in kdamond_fn() before letting damon_start() returns and set it just before the cancelling of the remaining damos_walk() request is executed. damos_walk() reads the obsolete field under the lock and avoids adding a new request.

After this change, only requests that are guaranteed to be handled or cancelled are registered. Hence the after-registration DAMON context termination check is no longer needed. Remove it together.

The issue is found by sashiko [1].

CVSS v3
4.7
EG Score
4.7(medium)
EG Risk
26(Track)
EG Risk 26/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity47% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
0%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 27, 2026

Last Modified

June 16, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jun 16, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

mm/damon/core: fix damos_walk() vs kdamond_fn() exit race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33c3f6c2b48cd84b441dba1ee3e62290e53930f4
generic

mm/damon/core: fix damos_walk() vs kdamond_fn() exit race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ba956a239ba6e3fae8555d3660e22e675be63b5

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46008(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.4-1~bpo13+1 (134 versions)7.0.4-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 156 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-14 08:37 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-14 08:37 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-14 08:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-13 04:09 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-25 05:31 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-25 05:31 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-25 05:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-23 15:21 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-23 15:21 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-23 15:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-21 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-21 20:42 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-21 20:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-20 11:36 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-20 11:36 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-20 11:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-17 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-17 09:19 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-17 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-16 02:52 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-16 02:52 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-16 02:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-15 01:34 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-15 01:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-14 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-14 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-13 00:33 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-13 00:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-12 00:27 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-12 00:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-11 00:14 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-11 00:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-09 21:54 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-09 21:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-08 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-08 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-07 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-07 21:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-06 21:00 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-06 21:00 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-06 21:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-05 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-05 20:54 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-05 20:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-03 16:28 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-03 16:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-02 15:31 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-02 15:31 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-02 15:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-01 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-01 15:25 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-01 15:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-31 07:33 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-07-31 07:33 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-07-31 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-29 15:20 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-07-29 15:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-27 11:43 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-07-27 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-23 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-11 23:50 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-07-11 23:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-09 00:00 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-07-08 23:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-01 10:47 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46008?
CVE-2026-46008 is a medium vulnerability published on May 27, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/damon/core: fix damoswalk() vs kdamondfn() exit race When kdamond_fn() main loop is finished, the function cancels remaining damoswalk() request and unset the damonctx->kdamond so that API callers and API functions themselves…
When was CVE-2026-46008 disclosed?
CVE-2026-46008 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 27, 2026, with the most recent update on June 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-46008 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46008 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 99.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46008?
CVE-2026-46008 has a CVSS v3 base score of 4.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46008?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-46008, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46008

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46008?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.