CVE-2026-45942

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-27. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports

A bitmap inconsistency issue was observed during stress tests under mixed huge-page workloads. Ext4 reported multiple e4b bitmap check failures like:

ext4_mb_complex_scan_group:2508: group 350, 8179 free clusters as per group info. But got 8192 blocks

Analysis and experimentation confirmed that the issue is caused by a race condition between page migration and bitmap modification. Although this timing window is extremely narrow, it is still hit in practice:

folio_lock ext4_mb_load_buddy __migrate_folio check ref count folio_mc_copy __filemap_get_folio folio_try_get(folio) ...... mb_mark_used ext4_mb_unload_buddy __folio_migrate_mapping folio_ref_freeze folio_unlock

The root cause of this issue is that the fast path of load_buddy only increments the folio's reference count, which is insufficient to prevent concurrent folio migration. We observed that the folio migration process acquires the folio lock. Therefore, we can determine whether to take the fast path in load_buddy by checking the lock status. If the folio is locked, we opt for the slow path (which acquires the lock) to close this concurrency window.

Additionally, this change addresses the following issues:

When the DOUBLE_CHECK macro is enabled to inspect bitmap-related issues, the following error may be triggered:

corruption in group 324 at byte 784(6272): f in copy != ff on disk/prealloc

Analysis reveals that this is a false positive. There is a specific race window where the bitmap and the group descriptor become momentarily inconsistent, leading to this error report:

ext4_mb_load_buddy ext4_mb_load_buddy __filemap_get_folio(create|lock) folio_lock ext4_mb_init_cache folio_mark_uptodate __filemap_get_folio(no lock) ...... mb_mark_used mb_mark_used_double mb_cmp_bitmaps mb_set_bits(e4b->bd_bitmap) folio_unlock

The original logic assumed that since mb_cmp_bitmaps is called when the bitmap is newly loaded from disk, the folio lock would be sufficient to prevent concurrent access. However, this overlooks a specific race condition: if another process attempts to load buddy and finds the folio is already in an uptodate state, it will immediately begin using it without holding folio lock.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
1%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 27, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jun 4, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f29709a7a3fc38f5015d850504762cdef0e151f9
generic

ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c05033cfc5c7699cd4df8d48cef94d01da755f24
generic

ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bdc56a9c46b2a99c12313122b9352b619a2e719e
generic

ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/57e83bfbe1e412ac42daced2086f3c6f9a17bba0
generic

ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/29a07d691d282faf38c33d4b61839b89399110f9

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-45942(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(14)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (335 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)6.12.85-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.18~rc7-1~exp1 (100 versions)6.18.14-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(14)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 79× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 231 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-25 05:40 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-25 05:40 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-25 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-23 15:28 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-23 15:28 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-23 15:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-21 20:51 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-21 20:51 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-21 20:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-20 12:37 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-20 12:37 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-20 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-17 09:20 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-17 09:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-16 16:26 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-16 16:26 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-16 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-16 02:53 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-16 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-15 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-15 02:58 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-15 02:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-14 14:08 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-14 14:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-14 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-14 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-14 01:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-13 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-13 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-12 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-12 14:50 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-12 14:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-12 02:12 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-12 02:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-11 13:36 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-11 13:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-11 00:15 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-11 00:15 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-11 00:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-10 11:40 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-10 11:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-09 23:03 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-09 23:03 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-09 23:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-09 10:28 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-09 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-08 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-08 21:52 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-08 21:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-08 04:48 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-08 04:48 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-08 04:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-07 16:12 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-07 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-07 03:36 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-07 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-06 14:59 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-06 14:59 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-06 14:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-06 02:19 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-06 02:19 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-06 02:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-08-05 13:44 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-05 13:44 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-05 13:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-08-04 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-04 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-03 16:29 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-03 16:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-02 16:52 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-02 16:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-02 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-02 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-01 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-01 15:39 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-01 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-45942?
CVE-2026-45942 is a high vulnerability published on May 27, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix e4b bitmap inconsistency reports A bitmap inconsistency issue was observed during stress tests under mixed huge-page workloads. Ext4 reported multiple e4b bitmap check failures like: ext4mbcomplexscangroup:2508: group…
When was CVE-2026-45942 disclosed?
CVE-2026-45942 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 27, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-45942 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-45942 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 99.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45942?
CVE-2026-45942 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45942?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-45942, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-45942

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45942?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.