vm2 is an open source vm/sandbox for Node.js. Prior to 3.11.3, it is possible to catch a host exception using the yield* expression inside an async generator. When the generator is closed using the return function, the value is awaited on and exceptions thrown in the then call will be caught by the runtime and passed to the yield* iterator as the next value. This allows attackers to write code which can escape from the VM2 sandbox and execute arbitrary commands on the host system. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.11.3.
CVE-2026-45411
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.9% (58th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 75EG Risk 75/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.9%
- EPSS %ILE
- 58th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 13, 2026
Last Modified
September 7, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Oct 13, 2026Sandbox Breakout Using Async Generator · Advisory · patriksimek/vm2 · GitHub
https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-248r-7h7q-cr242477210 – (CVE-2026-45411) CVE-2026-45411 vm2: vm2: Arbitrary Code Execution due to sandbox escape vulnerability
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2477210CVE-2026-45411 - Red Hat Customer Portal
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45411Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-45411(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | ansible-automation-platform/automation-portal:1785854226 | 2026-08-05 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| vm2 | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 241 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 141 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-16 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 22:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-15 18:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 18:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-14 12:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 12:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-13 09:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 07:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-11 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-27 04:45 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-07 13:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 13:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 12:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 12:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 13:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 12:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 12:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-23 22:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 17:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 17:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-20 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 19:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-17 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 14:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-17 10:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 10:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-16 12:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 08:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 04:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 04:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-14 23:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 19:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 14:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 10:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 06:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 02:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 02:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
- 2026-08-13 08:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 00:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 19:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 15:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 15:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 44th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownnpm:vm2
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:50850
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-45411?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-45411 published?
Is CVE-2026-45411 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-45411?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-45411?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-45411
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-45411?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.