Rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Starting in version 1.48.0 and prior to version 1.73.5, the RC endpoint operations/fsinfo is exposed without AuthRequired: true and accepts attacker-controlled fs input. Because rc.GetFs(...) supports inline backend definitions, an unauthenticated attacker can instantiate an attacker-controlled backend on demand. For the WebDAV backend, bearer_token_command is executed during backend initialization, making single-request unauthenticated local command execution possible on reachable RC deployments without global HTTP authentication. Version 1.73.5 patches the issue.
CVE-2026-41179
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 5.3% (92nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 75EG Risk 75/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 5.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 92nd
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
April 23, 2026
Last Modified
July 15, 2026
Advisory Details (9)
Auto-updated Oct 10, 2026Unauthenticated RC operations/fsinfo allows attacker-controlled backend instantiation and local command execution via WebDAV bearer_token_command · Advisory · rclone/rclone · GitHub
https://github.com/rclone/rclone/security/advisories/GHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q2460988 – (CVE-2026-41179) CVE-2026-41179 github.com/rclone/rclone: Rclone: Unauthenticated local command execution via exposed RC endpoint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2460988CVE-2026-41179 - Red Hat Customer Portal
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41179rclone v1.73.5
Patch available: rclone/rclone v1.73.5
https://github.com/rclone/rclone/releases/tag/v1.73.5commit 2a9e952b38e0 (rclone/rclone)
Fix landed in rclone/rclone commit 2a9e952b38e0 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rclone/rclone/commit/2a9e952b38e03a96bf40c9eb6e8e22199865ee3brclone/fs/rc/cache.go at bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82 · rclone/rclone · GitHub
https://github.com/rclone/rclone/blob/bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82/fs/rc/cache.gorclone/fs/operations/rc.go at bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82 · rclone/rclone · GitHub
https://github.com/rclone/rclone/blob/bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82/fs/operations/rc.gorclone/backend/webdav/webdav.go at bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82 · rclone/rclone · GitHub
https://github.com/rclone/rclone/blob/bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82/backend/webdav/webdav.goVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-41179(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | rclone (1.50.2-2ubuntu0.2+esm1) @ focal | 2026-10-16 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Go(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/ncw/rclone | — |
| — |
| github.com/rclone/rclone | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rclone | 1.60.1+dfsg-2 ... 1.69.3+dfsg-3 (8 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| rclone | 1.60.1+dfsg-4 ... 1.69.3+dfsg-3 (6 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 279 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 179 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-10-16 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 07:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-10-15 06:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 06:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-10-14 02:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 22:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-10-11 03:31 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-21 15:49 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-02 13:04 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-16 09:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 05:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 05:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-14 23:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 19:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 15:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 12:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 08:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 04:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 04:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-13 08:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 01:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 21:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 18:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 18:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-12 00:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 20:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 16:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 16:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-11 06:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 02:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-10 12:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 08:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 04:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 00:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 20:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 16:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 16:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 94th percentile
- 2026-08-09 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 07:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 03:27 UTCEG score recompute
Public detection templates
(1 reference)A public Nuclei detection template is referenced for this CVE. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code.
- Nucleihttp/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41179.yamlPublished Apr 23, 2026
RClone RC - Command Injection
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownGo:github.com/ncw/rclone · Go:github.com/rclone/rclone
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-306 · CWE-94 · CWE-78
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-41179?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-41179 published?
Is CVE-2026-41179 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-41179?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-41179?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-41179
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-41179?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.