In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: Change AMDGPU_VA_RESERVED_TRAP_SIZE to 64KB
Currently, AMDGPU_VA_RESERVED_TRAP_SIZE is hardcoded to 8KB, while
KFD_CWSR_TBA_TMA_SIZE is defined as 2 * PAGE_SIZE. On systems with
4K pages, both values match (8KB), so allocation and reserved space
are consistent.
However, on 64K page-size systems, KFD_CWSR_TBA_TMA_SIZE becomes 128KB,
while the reserved trap area remains 8KB. This mismatch causes the
kernel to crash when running rocminfo or rccl unit tests.
Kernel attempted to read user page (2) - exploit attempt? (uid: 1001)
BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000002
Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000002c8a64
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
CPU: 34 UID: 1001 PID: 9379 Comm: rocminfo Tainted: G E
6.19.0-rc4-amdgpu-00320-gf23176405700 #56 VOLUNTARY
Tainted: [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: IBM,9105-42A POWER10 (architected) 0x800200 0xf000006
of:IBM,FW1060.30 (ML1060_896) hv:phyp pSeries
NIP: c0000000002c8a64 LR: c00000000125dbc8 CTR: c00000000125e730
REGS: c0000001e0957580 TRAP: 0300 Tainted: G E
MSR: 8000000000009033 CR: 24008268
XER: 00000036
CFAR: c00000000125dbc4 DAR: 0000000000000002 DSISR: 40000000
IRQMASK: 1
GPR00: c00000000125d908 c0000001e0957820 c0000000016e8100
c00000013d814540
GPR04: 0000000000000002 c00000013d814550 0000000000000045
0000000000000000
GPR08: c00000013444d000 c00000013d814538 c00000013d814538
0000000084002268
GPR12: c00000000125e730 c000007e2ffd5f00 ffffffffffffffff
0000000000020000
GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000002 c00000015f653000
0000000000000000
GPR20: c000000138662400 c00000013d814540 0000000000000000
c00000013d814500
GPR24: 0000000000000000 0000000000000002 c0000001e0957888
c0000001e0957878
GPR28: c00000013d814548 0000000000000000 c00000013d814540
c0000001e0957888
NIP [c0000000002c8a64] __mutex_add_waiter+0x24/0xc0
LR [c00000000125dbc8] __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x318/0xd00
Call Trace:
0xc0000001e0957890 (unreliable)
__mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x58/0xd00
amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_alloc_memory_of_gpu+0x6fc/0xb60 [amdgpu]
kfd_process_alloc_gpuvm+0x54/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
kfd_process_device_init_cwsr_dgpu+0xa4/0x1a0 [amdgpu]
kfd_process_device_init_vm+0xd8/0x2e0 [amdgpu]
kfd_ioctl_acquire_vm+0xd0/0x130 [amdgpu]
kfd_ioctl+0x514/0x670 [amdgpu]
sys_ioctl+0x134/0x180
system_call_exception+0x114/0x300
system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
This patch changes AMDGPU_VA_RESERVED_TRAP_SIZE to 64 KB and
KFD_CWSR_TBA_TMA_SIZE to the AMD GPU page size. This means we reserve
64 KB for the trap in the address space, but only allocate 8 KB within
it. With this approach, the allocation size never exceeds the reserved
area.
(cherry picked from commit 31b8de5e55666f26ea7ece5f412b83eab3f56dbb)
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it