CVE-2026-31712

HIGHPre-NVD 8.38.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-01. the CNA's CVSS baseline 8.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
8.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.3Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: require minimum ACE size in smb_check_perm_dacl()

Both ACE-walk loops in smb_check_perm_dacl() only guard against an under-sized remaining buffer, not against an ACE whose declared ace->size is smaller than the struct it claims to describe:

if (offsetof(struct smb_ace, access_req) > aces_size) break; ace_size = le16_to_cpu(ace->size); if (ace_size > aces_size) break;

The first check only requires the 4-byte ACE header to be in bounds; it does not require access_req (4 bytes at offset 4) to be readable. An attacker who has set a crafted DACL on a file they own can declare ace->size == 4 with aces_size == 4, pass both checks, and then

granted |= le32_to_cpu(ace->access_req); /* upper loop */ compare_sids(&sid, &ace->sid); /* lower loop */

reads access_req at offset 4 (OOB by up to 4 bytes) and ace->sid at offset 8 (OOB by up to CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE + SID_MAX_SUB_AUTHORITIES * 4 bytes).

Tighten both loops to require

ace_size >= offsetof(struct smb_ace, sid) + CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE

which is the smallest valid on-wire ACE layout (4-byte header + 4-byte access_req + 8-byte sid base with zero sub-auths). Also reject ACEs whose sid.num_subauth exceeds SID_MAX_SUB_AUTHORITIES before letting compare_sids() dereference sub_auth[] entries.

parse_sec_desc() already enforces an equivalent check (lines 441-448); smb_check_perm_dacl() simply grew weaker validation over time.

Reachability: authenticated SMB client with permission to set an ACL on a file. On a subsequent CREATE against that file, the kernel walks the stored DACL via smb_check_perm_dacl() and triggers the OOB read. Not pre-auth, and the OOB read is not reflected to the attacker, but KASAN reports and kernel state corruption are possible.

CVSS v3
8.3
EG Score
8.3(medium)
EG Risk
42(Track)
EG Risk 42/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity83% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
24%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 1, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated May 3, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ksmbd: require minimum ACE size in smb_check_perm_dacl() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d07b26f39246a82399661936dd0c853983cfade7
generic

ksmbd: require minimum ACE size in smb_check_perm_dacl() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/95e5aa3c3261da8c95b27d7aecf8ee39b9f86a4c
generic

ksmbd: require minimum ACE size in smb_check_perm_dacl() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90089584b2e25c4510b7b987387b4405f0673ece
generic

ksmbd: require minimum ACE size in smb_check_perm_dacl() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/151b1799861fde38087c08f613abc2843ef597b0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-31712(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 5.15.210osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.174-1~deb11u1 (20 versions)6.1.176-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)6.12.85-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.1-1~exp1 (129 versions)7.0.3-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(18)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 67× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 228 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-04 00:59 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-16 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-16 05:18 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-16 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-14 16:59 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-14 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-14 03:47 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-14 03:47 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-14 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-13 06:42 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-13 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-12 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-12 17:25 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-12 17:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-11 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-11 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-11 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-11 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-11 01:49 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-11 01:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-10 05:02 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-10 05:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-09 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-09 15:59 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-09 15:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-09 02:57 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-09 02:57 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-09 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-08 01:21 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-08 01:21 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-08 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-07 12:19 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-07 12:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-06 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-06 17:06 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-06 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-06 01:38 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-06 01:38 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-06 01:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-05 12:36 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-05 12:36 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-05 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-03 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-03 20:25 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-03 20:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-02 18:43 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-02 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-02 05:40 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-02 05:40 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-02 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-23 03:08 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-31712?
CVE-2026-31712 is a high vulnerability published on May 1, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: require minimum ACE size in smbcheckperm_dacl() Both ACE-walk loops in smbcheckperm_dacl() only guard against an under-sized remaining buffer, not against an ACE whose declared ace->size is smaller than the struct it claims…
When was CVE-2026-31712 disclosed?
CVE-2026-31712 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 1, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-31712 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-31712 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 76.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31712?
CVE-2026-31712 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.3 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31712?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-31712, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-31712

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31712?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.