CVE-2026-31707

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-01. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg()

ipc_validate_msg() computes the expected message size for each response type by adding (or multiplying) attacker-controlled fields from the daemon response to a fixed struct size in unsigned int arithmetic. Three cases can overflow:

KSMBD_EVENT_RPC_REQUEST: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_rpc_command) + resp->payload_sz; KSMBD_EVENT_SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_share_config_response) + resp->payload_sz; KSMBD_EVENT_LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT: msg_sz = sizeof(struct ksmbd_login_response_ext) + resp->ngroups * sizeof(gid_t);

resp->payload_sz is __u32 and resp->ngroups is __s32. Each addition can wrap in unsigned int; the multiplication by sizeof(gid_t) mixes signed and size_t, so a negative ngroups is converted to SIZE_MAX before the multiply. A wrapped value of msg_sz that happens to equal entry->msg_sz bypasses the size check on the next line, and downstream consumers (smb2pdu.c:6742 memcpy using rpc_resp->payload_sz, kmemdup in ksmbd_alloc_user using resp_ext->ngroups) then trust the unverified length.

Use check_add_overflow() on the RPC_REQUEST and SHARE_CONFIG_REQUEST paths to detect integer overflow without constraining functional payload size; userspace ksmbd-tools grows NDR responses in 4096-byte chunks for calls like NetShareEnumAll, so a hard transport cap is unworkable on the response side. For LOGIN_REQUEST_EXT, reject resp->ngroups outside the signed [0, NGROUPS_MAX] range up front and report the error from ipc_validate_msg() so it fires at the IPC boundary; with that bound the subsequent multiplication and addition stay well below UINT_MAX. The now-redundant ngroups check and pr_err in ksmbd_alloc_user() are removed.

This is the response-side analogue of aab98e2dbd64 ("ksmbd: fix integer overflows on 32 bit systems"), which hardened the request side.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1(medium)
EG Risk
37(Track)
EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 1, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated May 6, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d6a6aa81eac2c9bff66dc6e191179cb69a14426b
generic

ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/99c631d0366c1eab8fb188fe66425f4581ebdde4
generic

ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7dd0c858e1909769a4c91842724315ee74f1a5f1
generic

ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipc_validate_msg() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/299db777ea0cfa5c407e41b045c24a14c034c27b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-31707(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
linuxKernel @ 6.6.141osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (350 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)6.12.85-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.1-1~exp1 (132 versions)7.0.3-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(18)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 29× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 230 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-04 00:59 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-16 05:19 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-16 05:19 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-16 05:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-14 16:59 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-14 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-14 03:47 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-14 03:47 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-14 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-13 06:42 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-13 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-12 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-12 17:25 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-12 17:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-11 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-11 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-11 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-11 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-11 01:49 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-11 01:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-10 05:02 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-10 05:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-09 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-09 15:59 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-09 15:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-09 02:57 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-09 02:57 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-09 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-08 01:21 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-08 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-07 12:19 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-07 12:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-06 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-06 17:06 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-06 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-06 01:38 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-06 01:38 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-06 01:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-05 12:36 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-05 12:36 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-05 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-03 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-03 20:25 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-03 20:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-08-02 18:43 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-02 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-02 05:41 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-02 05:41 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-02 05:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-23 03:08 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-31707?
CVE-2026-31707 is a high vulnerability published on May 1, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: validate response sizes in ipcvalidatemsg() ipcvalidatemsg() computes the expected message size for each response type by adding (or multiplying) attacker-controlled fields from the daemon response to a fixed struct size in…
When was CVE-2026-31707 disclosed?
CVE-2026-31707 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 1, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-31707 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-31707 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31707?
CVE-2026-31707 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.1 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31707?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-31707, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-31707

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31707?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.