CVE-2026-31479

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-04-22. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-24838 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-ch6h-82qw-75ww (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/xe: always keep track of remap prev/next

During 3D workload, user is reporting hitting:

[ 413.361679] WARNING: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c:1217 at vm_bind_ioctl_ops_unwind+0x1e2/0x2e0 [xe], CPU#7: vkd3d_queue/9925 [ 413.361944] CPU: 7 UID: 1000 PID: 9925 Comm: vkd3d_queue Kdump: loaded Not tainted 7.0.0-070000rc3-generic #202603090038 PREEMPT(lazy) [ 413.361949] RIP: 0010:vm_bind_ioctl_ops_unwind+0x1e2/0x2e0 [xe] [ 413.362074] RSP: 0018:ffffd4c25c3df930 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 413.362077] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8f3ee817ed10 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 413.362078] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 413.362079] RBP: ffffd4c25c3df980 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 413.362081] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8f41fbf99380 [ 413.362082] R13: ffff8f3ee817e968 R14: 00000000ffffffef R15: ffff8f43d00bd380 [ 413.362083] FS: 00000001040ff6c0(0000) GS:ffff8f4696d89000(0000) knlGS:00000000330b0000 [ 413.362085] CS: 0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 413.362086] CR2: 00007ddfc4747000 CR3: 00000002e6262005 CR4: 0000000000f72ef0 [ 413.362088] PKRU: 55555554 [ 413.362089] Call Trace: [ 413.362092] [ 413.362096] xe_vm_bind_ioctl+0xa9a/0xc60 [xe]

Which seems to hint that the vma we are re-inserting for the ops unwind is either invalid or overlapping with something already inserted in the vm. It shouldn't be invalid since this is a re-insertion, so must have worked before. Leaving the likely culprit as something already placed where we want to insert the vma.

Following from that, for the case where we do something like a rebind in the middle of a vma, and one or both mapped ends are already compatible, we skip doing the rebind of those vma and set next/prev to NULL. As well as then adjust the original unmap va range, to avoid unmapping the ends. However, if we trigger the unwind path, we end up with three va, with the two ends never being removed and the original va range in the middle still being the shrunken size.

If this occurs, one failure mode is when another unwind op needs to interact with that range, which can happen with a vector of binds. For example, if we need to re-insert something in place of the original va. In this case the va is still the shrunken version, so when removing it and then doing a re-insert it can overlap with the ends, which were never removed, triggering a warning like above, plus leaving the vm in a bad state.

With that, we need two things here:

1) Stop nuking the prev/next tracking for the skip cases. Instead relying on checking for skip prev/next, where needed. That way on the unwind path, we now correctly remove both ends.

2) Undo the unmap va shrinkage, on the unwind path. With the two ends now removed the unmap va should expand back to the original size again, before re-insertion.

v2:

  • Update the explanation in the commit message, based on an actual IGT of
triggering this issue, rather than conjecture.
  • Also undo the unmap shrinkage, for the skip case. With the two ends
now removed, the original unmap va range should expand back to the original range. v3:
  • Track the old start/range separately. vma_size/start() uses the va
info directly.

(cherry picked from commit aec6969f75afbf4e01fd5fb5850ed3e9c27043ac)

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

April 22, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jun 4, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

drm/xe: always keep track of remap prev/next - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e6ba1749549e87b83c0c4885d84b543687c3740e
Web page

drm/xe: always keep track of remap prev/next - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ccd41f110c608b3cc347b9be881c3e72cd634b2b
Web page

drm/xe: always keep track of remap prev/next - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfe9e314d7574d1c5c851972e7aee342733819d2
Web page

drm/xe: always keep track of remap prev/next - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5eda8001ebb5269755608d678dd1f3928ab077c9

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1035.38) @ noble2026-10-27ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.55.1.el10_22026-09-15redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.47.1.el9_82026-09-14redhat
linuxKernel @ 6.12.80 (fixes >=6.8.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.85-1: fixed in 6.12.85-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (125 versions)
  • every version up to 6.19.11-1: fixed in 6.19.11-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 49× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 95 of 272 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 5 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 177 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-27 19:14 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-27 19:14 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-27 19:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch6h-82qw-75ww · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  5. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 14:36 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-19 19:36 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-19 19:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch6h-82qw-75ww · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  16. 2026-10-19 19:00 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-19 19:00 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-19 19:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch6h-82qw-75ww · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  19. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 03:48 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-16 17:02 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-16 17:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch6h-82qw-75ww · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
Show 70 more
  1. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-16 15:36 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-16 15:36 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-16 15:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch6h-82qw-75ww · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  5. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 16:15 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 19:57 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 17:10 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 14:39 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  14. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  15. 2026-10-10 18:03 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  19. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  21. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  22. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  23. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  24. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  25. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  26. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  27. 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  28. 2026-09-21 05:19 UTCOSV refresh
  29. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  30. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  31. 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  32. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  33. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  34. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  35. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  36. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  37. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  38. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  39. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  40. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  41. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  42. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  43. 2026-09-02 03:04 UTCOSV refresh
  44. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  45. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  46. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  47. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  48. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  49. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  50. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  51. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  52. 2026-08-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  53. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  54. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  55. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  56. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  57. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  58. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  59. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  60. 2026-08-16 06:00 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-16 06:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch6h-82qw-75ww · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  62. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  63. 2026-08-15 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-15 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch6h-82qw-75ww · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  65. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  66. 2026-08-14 15:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch6h-82qw-75ww · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  67. 2026-08-14 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-14 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch6h-82qw-75ww · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  69. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  70. 2026-08-13 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ch6h-82qw-75ww · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-31479?
CVE-2026-31479 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 22, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/xe: always keep track of remap prev/next During 3D workload, user is reporting hitting: [ 413.361679] WARNING: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xevm.c:1217 at vmbindioctlopsunwind+0x1e2/0x2e0 [xe], CPU#7: vkd3dqueue/9925 [ 413.361944] CPU: 7…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-31479 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-31479 was published on April 22, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-31479 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-31479 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-31479?
CVE-2026-31479 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-31479?
A fix for CVE-2026-31479 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-31479 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-31479

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-31479?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.