Next.js is a React framework for building full-stack web applications. Starting in version 9.5.0 and prior to versions 15.5.13 and 16.1.7, when Next.js rewrites proxy traffic to an external backend, a crafted DELETE/OPTIONS request using Transfer-Encoding: chunked could trigger request boundary disagreement between the proxy and backend. This could allow request smuggling through rewritten routes. An attacker could smuggle a second request to unintended backend routes (for example, internal/admin endpoints), bypassing assumptions that only the configured rewrite destination/path is reachable. This does not impact applications hosted on providers that handle rewrites at the CDN level, such as Vercel. The vulnerability originated in an upstream library vendored by Next.js. It is fixed in Next.js 15.5.13 and 16.1.7 by updating that dependency’s behavior so content-length: 0 is added only when both content-length and transfer-encoding are absent, and transfer-encoding is no longer removed in that code path. If upgrading is not immediately possible, block chunked DELETE/OPTIONS requests on rewritten routes at the edge/proxy, and/or enforce authentication/authorization on backend routes.
CVE-2026-29057
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5(low)
- EG Risk
- 34(Track)EG Risk 34/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity65% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- —
- EPSS %ILE
- —
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
March 18, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
References (4)
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/vercel/next.js/commit/dc98c04f376c6a1df76ec3e0a2d07edf4abdabd6
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v15.5.13
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/vercel/next.js/releases/tag/v16.1.7
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/vercel/next.js/security/advisories/GHSA-ggv3-7p47-pfv8
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 1× in last 7d / 1× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-27 14:14 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-444
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2026-29057?
When was CVE-2026-29057 disclosed?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-29057?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-29057?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-29057
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-29057?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.