Seagull Software BarTender 2010, 2016, and 2019 contain an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the .NET Remoting service exposed on TCP port 7375 via BtSystem.Service.exe. The service registers an unauthenticated singleton endpoint — BarTenderSystem for BarTender 2016 <= R9, and DataServiceSingleton for BarTender 2019 <= R10 — configured with BinaryServerFormatterSinkProvider and TypeFilterLevel set to Full. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit .NET Remoting object unmarshalling to read or write arbitrary files on the server using the .NET WebClient class, or coerce NTLMv2 authentication by supplying a UNC path to an attacker-controlled server, enabling sensitive credential disclosure, remote code execution, or lateral movement depending on service account privileges and network environment. The service runs in the context of NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM. This vulnerability is corrected in BarTender 12.0.1. Users of affected releases should upgrade to BarTender 12.0.1 or later.
CVE-2026-25550
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-06-04. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-34304 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
Upgrade affected installations to BarTender 12.0.1 or later (from the CVE record's solution, VulnCheck) — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.8
- EG Score
- 9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 59EG Risk 59/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity98% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.9% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: Upgrade affected installations to BarTender 12.0.1 or later (from the CVE record's solution, VulnCheck). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.9%
- EPSS %ILE
- 59th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-30). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Upgrade affected installations to BarTender 12.0.1 or later (from the CVE record's solution, VulnCheck). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
June 4, 2026
Last Modified
September 16, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026Seagull Software BarTender Unauthenticated RCE via .NET Remoting Service | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/seagull-software-bartender-unauthenticated-rce-via-net-remoting-serviceSeagull Trust Center | Powered by SafeBase
https://trust.seagullsoftware.com/?tcuUid=55ed135f-683c-4e9b-a59d-7d4373c0ac7eSeagull BarTender - CVE-2026-25550 / CVE-2026-25551 · GitHub
https://gist.github.com/VAMorales/dde5b1c0415a8505ccd6fafdb095a618Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-25550(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 73× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 99 of 515 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 416 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-31 09:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-31 09:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-30 11:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-30 11:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-29 13:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-29 13:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-28 15:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-27 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-27 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-26 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-26 19:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-25 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-25 19:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 21:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-23 23:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 23:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 74 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-23 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-23 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-22 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-22 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-21 04:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-21 04:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-20 06:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 06:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-19 08:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 08:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-18 09:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-18 03:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-17 06:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 06:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-16 07:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 07:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-15 06:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 06:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-14 02:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 02:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 22:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 22:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-10-11 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.4% · 71st percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-16 17:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 17:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-16 15:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 15:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-14 09:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-14 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 05:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-02 17:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 17:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2q9g-666g-vcp9 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-502 · CWE-306
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-25550?
When was CVE-2026-25550 made public?
Is CVE-2026-25550 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-25550?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-25550?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-25550
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-25550?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.