Langroid is a framework for building large-language-model-powered applications. Prior to version 0.59.32, there is a bypass to the fix for CVE-2025-46724. TableChatAgent can call pandas_eval tool to evaluate the expression. There is a WAF in langroid/utils/pandas_utils.py introduced to block code injection CVE-2025-46724. However it can be bypassed due to _literal_ok() returning False instead of raising UnsafeCommandError on invalid input, combined with unrestricted access to dangerous dunder attributes (__init__, __globals__, __builtins__). This allows chaining whitelisted DataFrame methods to leak the eval builtin and execute arbitrary code. This issue has been patched in version 0.59.32.
CVE-2026-25481
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.6 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.8% (56th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.6
- EG Score
- 9.6CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 74EG Risk 74/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity96% × 45%The EG Score, 9.6 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.8%
- EPSS %ILE
- 56th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
February 4, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026Security Vulnerability Report: WAF Bypass Leading to RCE in TableChatAgent · Advisory · langroid/langroid · GitHub
https://github.com/langroid/langroid/security/advisories/GHSA-x34r-63hx-w57fCode Injection vulnerability in TableChatAgent · Advisory · langroid/langroid · GitHub
https://github.com/langroid/langroid/security/advisories/GHSA-jqq5-wc57-f8hjcommit 30abbc1a854d (langroid/langroid)
Patch available: langroid/langroid 0.65.4 (contains commit 30abbc1a854d)
https://github.com/langroid/langroid/commit/30abbc1a854dee22fbd2f8b2f575dfdabdb603eaVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-25481(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| langroid | 0.1.100 ... 0.9.5 (515 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 94 of 183 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 6 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 89 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-17 07:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-16 07:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-15 06:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-14 02:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-12 22:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-09 09:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
Show 69 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-19 16:30 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-31 19:34 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-14 11:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-13 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-09 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-07 22:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-06 04:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-02 21:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-31 10:42 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-23 03:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownPyPI:langroid
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-25481?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-25481 published?
Is CVE-2026-25481 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-25481?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-25481?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-25481
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-25481?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.