CVE-2026-23107

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-02-04. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

arm64/fpsimd: signal: Allocate SSVE storage when restoring ZA

The code to restore a ZA context doesn't attempt to allocate the task's sve_state before setting TIF_SME. Consequently, restoring a ZA context can place a task into an invalid state where TIF_SME is set but the task's sve_state is NULL.

In legitimate but uncommon cases where the ZA signal context was NOT created by the kernel in the context of the same task (e.g. if the task is saved/restored with something like CRIU), we have no guarantee that sve_state had been allocated previously. In these cases, userspace can enter streaming mode without trapping while sve_state is NULL, causing a later NULL pointer dereference when the kernel attempts to store the register state:

| # ./sigreturn-za | Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 | Mem abort info: | ESR = 0x0000000096000046 | EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits | SET = 0, FnV = 0 | EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 | FSC = 0x06: level 2 translation fault | Data abort info: | ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000046, ISS2 = 0x00000000 | CM = 0, WnR = 1, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 | GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 | user pgtable: 4k pages, 52-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000101f47c00 | [0000000000000000] pgd=08000001021d8403, p4d=0800000102274403, pud=0800000102275403, pmd=0000000000000000 | Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000046 [#1] SMP | Modules linked in: | CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 153 Comm: sigreturn-za Not tainted 6.19.0-rc1 #1 PREEMPT | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 214000c9 (nzCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) | pc : sve_save_state+0x4/0xf0 | lr : fpsimd_save_user_state+0xb0/0x1c0 | sp : ffff80008070bcc0 | x29: ffff80008070bcc0 x28: fff00000c1ca4c40 x27: 63cfa172fb5cf658 | x26: fff00000c1ca5228 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 | x23: 0000000000000000 x22: fff00000c1ca4c40 x21: fff00000c1ca4c40 | x20: 0000000000000020 x19: fff00000ff6900f0 x18: 0000000000000000 | x17: fff05e8e0311f000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 028fca8f3bdaf21c | x14: 0000000000000212 x13: fff00000c0209f10 x12: 0000000000000020 | x11: 0000000000200b20 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : fff00000ff69dcc0 | x8 : 00000000000003f2 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : fff00000c1ca5b48 | x5 : fff05e8e0311f000 x4 : 0000000008000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 | x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : fff00000c1ca5970 x0 : 0000000000000440 | Call trace: | sve_save_state+0x4/0xf0 (P) | fpsimd_thread_switch+0x48/0x198 | __switch_to+0x20/0x1c0 | __schedule+0x36c/0xce0 | schedule+0x34/0x11c | exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x124/0x188 | el0_interrupt+0xc8/0xd8 | __el0_irq_handler_common+0x18/0x24 | el0t_64_irq_handler+0x10/0x1c | el0t_64_irq+0x198/0x19c | Code: 54000040 d51b4408 d65f03c0 d503245f (e5bb5800) | ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Fix this by having restore_za_context() ensure that the task's sve_state is allocated, matching what we do when taking an SME trap. Any live SVE/SSVE state (which is restored earlier from a separate signal context) must be preserved, and hence this is not zeroed.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 4, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 9, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

arm64/fpsimd: signal: Allocate SSVE storage when restoring ZA - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ea8ccfddbce0bee6310da4f3fc560ad520f5e6b4
generic

arm64/fpsimd: signal: Allocate SSVE storage when restoring ZA - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5a5b150992ebab779c1ce54f54676786e47e94c
generic

arm64/fpsimd: signal: Allocate SSVE storage when restoring ZA - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/70f7f54566afc23f2c71bf1411af81f5d8009e0f
generic

arm64/fpsimd: signal: Allocate SSVE storage when restoring ZA - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/19b2c3f3ca1b4b6dccd2a42aca2692d8c79c4214
generic

arm64/fpsimd: signal: Allocate SSVE storage when restoring ZA - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0af233d66eff90fb8f3e0fc09f2316bba0b72bb9

Patch Availability(8)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-22.04 (6.8.1-1051.52~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-06-07ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-116.116+fips1) @ noble2026-06-07ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1024.24) @ noble2026-06-07ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1054.57.1) @ noble2026-06-07ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-22.04-edge (6.8.0-1054.57~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-06-07ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1056.62) @ noble2026-06-07ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1059.65+fips1) @ noble2026-06-07ubuntu
linuxKernel @ 6.1.162—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.159-1~deb11u1 (14 versions)6.1.162-1~deb11u1—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (46 versions)6.1.162-1—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.69-1~bpo12+1 (10 versions)6.12.69-1—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.18~rc7-1~exp1 (96 versions)6.18.8-1—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(14)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 167 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 23:23 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-31 03:02 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-14 11:13 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-14 11:13 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-14 11:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-13 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-13 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-13 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-09 15:52 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-09 15:52 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-09 15:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-07 22:47 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-07 22:47 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-07 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-06 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-06 04:23 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-06 04:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-02 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-02 21:26 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-02 21:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-07-30 22:51 UTCOSV refresh
  40. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-23 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-13 08:07 UTCOSV refresh
  64. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore

Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23107?
CVE-2026-23107 is a medium vulnerability published on February 4, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: arm64/fpsimd: signal: Allocate SSVE storage when restoring ZA The code to restore a ZA context doesn't attempt to allocate the task's svestate before setting TIFSME. Consequently, restoring a ZA context can place a task into an…
When was CVE-2026-23107 disclosed?
CVE-2026-23107 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 4, 2026, with the most recent update on June 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-23107 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23107 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23107?
CVE-2026-23107 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23107?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-23107, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-23107

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23107?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Start Free Scan →Browse All CVEs