CVE-2026-23159

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-02-14. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

perf: sched: Fix perf crash with new is_user_task() helper

In order to do a user space stacktrace the current task needs to be a user task that has executed in user space. It use to be possible to test if a task is a user task or not by simply checking the task_struct mm field. If it was non NULL, it was a user task and if not it was a kernel task.

But things have changed over time, and some kernel tasks now have their own mm field.

An idea was made to instead test PF_KTHREAD and two functions were used to wrap this check in case it became more complex to test if a task was a user task or not[1]. But this was rejected and the C code simply checked the PF_KTHREAD directly.

It was later found that not all kernel threads set PF_KTHREAD. The io-uring helpers instead set PF_USER_WORKER and this needed to be added as well.

But checking the flags is still not enough. There's a very small window when a task exits that it frees its mm field and it is set back to NULL. If perf were to trigger at this moment, the flags test would say its a user space task but when perf would read the mm field it would crash with at NULL pointer dereference.

Now there are flags that can be used to test if a task is exiting, but they are set in areas that perf may still want to profile the user space task (to see where it exited). The only real test is to check both the flags and the mm field.

Instead of making this modification in every location, create a new is_user_task() helper function that does all the tests needed to know if it is safe to read the user space memory or not.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 14, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 7, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

perf: sched: Fix perf crash with new is_user_task() helper - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d84a4836dc246b7dc244e46a08ff992956b68db0
generic

perf: sched: Fix perf crash with new is_user_task() helper - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a28fce0365e1cb9cb8c04c893b9334e5ca9d9f1c
generic

perf: sched: Fix perf crash with new is_user_task() helper - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/76ed27608f7dd235b727ebbb12163438c2fbb617
generic

perf: sched: Fix perf crash with new is_user_task() helper - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5aac392fcd3d981d7997f1a0766829e1afdeac2e

Patch Availability(8)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.69-1~bpo12+1 (10 versions)6.12.69-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.18~rc7-1~exp1 (98 versions)6.18.9-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(14)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 173 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 21:36 UTCOSV refresh
  2. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-31 00:23 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-14 10:03 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-14 10:03 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-14 10:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-13 02:22 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-13 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-13 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-11 07:54 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-11 07:54 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-11 07:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-09 14:38 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-09 14:38 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-09 14:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-07 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-07 21:55 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-07 21:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-06 03:47 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-06 03:47 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-06 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-02 20:34 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-02 20:34 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-02 20:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-23 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-17 14:29 UTCOSV refresh
  58. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-23159?
CVE-2026-23159 is a medium vulnerability published on February 14, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf: sched: Fix perf crash with new isusertask() helper In order to do a user space stacktrace the current task needs to be a user task that has executed in user space. It use to be possible to test if a task is a user task or not…
When was CVE-2026-23159 disclosed?
CVE-2026-23159 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 14, 2026, with the most recent update on June 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-23159 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-23159 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-23159?
CVE-2026-23159 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-23159?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-23159, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-23159

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-23159?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.