CVE-2026-1965

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.56.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-03-11. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
6.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 6.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

libcurl can in some circumstances reuse the wrong connection when asked to do an Negotiate-authenticated HTTP or HTTPS request.

libcurl features a pool of recent connections so that subsequent requests can reuse an existing connection to avoid overhead.

When reusing a connection a range of criterion must first be met. Due to a logical error in the code, a request that was issued by an application could wrongfully reuse an existing connection to the same server that was authenticated using different credentials. One underlying reason being that Negotiate sometimes authenticates *connections* and not *requests*, contrary to how HTTP is designed to work.

An application that allows Negotiate authentication to a server (that responds wanting Negotiate) with user1:password1 and then does another operation to the same server also using Negotiate but with user2:password2 (while the previous connection is still alive) - the second request wrongly reused the same connection and since it then sees that the Negotiate negotiation is already made, it just sends the request over that connection thinking it uses the user2 credentials when it is in fact still using the connection authenticated for user1...

The set of authentication methods to use is set with CURLOPT_HTTPAUTH.

Applications can disable libcurl's reuse of connections and thus mitigate this problem, by using one of the following libcurl options to alter how connections are or are not reused: CURLOPT_FRESH_CONNECT, CURLOPT_MAXCONNECTS and CURLMOPT_MAX_HOST_CONNECTIONS (if using the curl_multi API).

CVSS v3
6.5
EG Score
6.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity65% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
18%
KEV
Not listed

Published

March 11, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 4, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

curl - bad reuse of HTTP Negotiate connection - CVE-2026-1965

https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2026-1965.html

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulibcurl4t64 (8.14.1-2ubuntu1.2) @ questing2026-07-27ubuntu
ubuntulibcurl4-openssl-dev (7.68.0-1ubuntu2.25+esm3) @ focal2026-07-27ubuntu
redhatcurl-main-8.19.0-3.hum12026-04-07redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
curl8.19.0-r0
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
curl8.19.0-r0
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
curl7.74.0-1.3 ... 8.9.1-2~bpo12+1 (219 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
curl7.88.1-10 ... 8.9.1-2~bpo12+1 (178 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
curl8.14.1-2, 8.14.1-2+deb13u1, 8.14.1-2+deb13u2, 8.14.1-2+deb13u2~bpo13+1, 8.14.1-2+deb13u38.14.1-2+deb13u4
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
curl8.14.1-2 ... 8.19.0~rc2-2 (34 versions)8.19.0~rc3-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 35× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-02 20:10 UTCOSV refresh
  9. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-16 11:55 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-16 11:55 UTCVendor advisory
Show 48 more
  1. 2026-08-16 11:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-14 07:52 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-14 07:52 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-14 07:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-12 23:05 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-12 23:05 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-12 23:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-11 05:25 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-11 05:25 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-11 05:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-10 06:46 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-10 06:46 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-10 06:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-09 07:33 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-09 07:33 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-09 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-07 18:22 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-07 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-07 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-06 02:04 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-06 02:04 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-06 02:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-04 01:23 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-04 01:23 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-04 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-02 17:39 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-02 17:39 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-02 17:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-07-27 12:52 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-07-27 12:52 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-07-27 12:52 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-1965?
CVE-2026-1965 is a medium vulnerability published on March 11, 2026. libcurl can in some circumstances reuse the wrong connection when asked to do an Negotiate-authenticated HTTP or HTTPS request. libcurl features a pool of recent connections so that subsequent requests can reuse an existing connection to avoid overhead. When reusing a connection a range of…
When was CVE-2026-1965 disclosed?
CVE-2026-1965 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on March 11, 2026, with the most recent update on June 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-1965 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-1965 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 82.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-1965?
CVE-2026-1965 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-1965?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-1965, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-1965

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-1965?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.