A flaw was found in the guardrails-detectors component. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) by submitting a specially crafted XML Schema Definition (XSD) string. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information, including credentials from cloud metadata services, Kubernetes API, internal MinIO, and other internal network endpoints. Additionally, it enables local file reads of critical data such as service account tokens and pod secrets.
CVE-2026-15378
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 9.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-10. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.3
- EG Score
- 9.3CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 57EG Risk 57/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity93% × 45%The EG Score, 9.3 of 10.Exploitation0.5% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 42nd
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 10, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Oct 3, 20262498941 – (CVE-2026-15378) CVE-2026-15378 guardrails-detectors: guardrails-detectors: SSRF and local file read via user-supplied XML Schema (xml-with-schema:)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2498941CVE-2026-15378 - Red Hat Customer Portal
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-15378Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-15378(4)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:73987Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.3.7 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:65126Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.25.11 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:60520Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.4.4 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- GHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5GitHub Security AdvisoriesCritical
A flaw was found in the `guardrails-detectors` component. This vulnerability allows a remote...
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhoai/odh-fms-guardrails-orchestrator-rhel9:1789656673 | 2026-09-30 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-fms-guardrails-orchestrator-rhel9:1786710963 | 2026-09-08 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-fms-guardrails-orchestrator-rhel9:1787360218 | 2026-08-27 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 63× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 399 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 299 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-11 20:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 15:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 15:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-30 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 17:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 17:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-30 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 16:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 16:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-28 09:51 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-28 09:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 09:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-24 11:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 11:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 11:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-23 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-23 05:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 05:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 05:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-18 10:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 10:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-18 05:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 05:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 05:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-14 08:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-14 03:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 03:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-13 23:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 23:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-13 12:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 12:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-13 08:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 08:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 08:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
- 2026-09-12 13:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-12 03:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 03:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 03:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-08 03:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 03:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 03:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-06 02:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 02:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-05 21:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 21:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-31 01:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-31 01:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-08-30 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 20:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 20:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
- 2026-08-30 16:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 16:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
- 2026-08-30 11:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 11:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-85xg-h6rv-rgf5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:60520
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-15378?
When was CVE-2026-15378 made public?
Is CVE-2026-15378 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-15378?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-15378?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-15378
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-15378?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.