A vulnerability was found in bentoml OpenLLM 0.6.30. This affects the function async_run_command of the file src/openllm/common.py of the component Model Repository Directory Name Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument cmd results in command injection. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
CVE-2026-15035
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 2.2% (82nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 5.3 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2026-07-08) is not newer than that change (2026-07-09), so it does not.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).
- CVSS v3
- 7.8
- EG Score
- 7.8HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 51EG Risk 51/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity78% × 45%The EG Score, 7.8 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. - EPSS PROB
- 2.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 82nd
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 8, 2026
Last Modified
July 9, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Jul 9, 2026fix(security): use exec instead of shell in async_run_command (CWE-78)
Upstream fix in progress (PR #1235 · bentoml/OpenLLM, state=open)
https://github.com/bentoml/OpenLLM/pull/1235[Security] Shell command injection via malicious model repository directory names · Issue #1229 · bentoml/OpenLLM · GitHub
https://github.com/bentoml/OpenLLM/issues/1229GitHub - bentoml/OpenLLM: Run any open-source LLMs, such as DeepSeek and Llama, as OpenAI compatible API endpoint in the cloud. · GitHub
https://github.com/bentoml/OpenLLM/Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-15035(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| bentoml | 0.0.1 ... 0.6.3 (41 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 35× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 228 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 128 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 20:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 16:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 82nd percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-27 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-24 11:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-23 06:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 06:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-18 05:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 05:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-14 11:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-13 23:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 23:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-13 08:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-12 03:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 03:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-06 14:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 14:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-05 22:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 22:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-30 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-30 07:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 07:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-27 21:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 21:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-27 01:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 01:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-26 08:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.2% · 81st percentile
- 2026-08-25 10:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-24 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-24 10:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 10:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-23 23:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-23 11:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-23 00:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-08-22 13:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-22 02:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 02:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-08-21 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-21 04:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 03:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 73rd percentile
- 2026-08-20 15:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-20 02:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 02:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
- 2026-08-19 09:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-18 22:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 22:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6499-56p8-f7rq · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.5% · 72nd percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownPyPI:bentoml
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-15035?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-15035 published?
Is CVE-2026-15035 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-15035?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-15035?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-15035
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-15035?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.