CVE-2026-13481

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.45.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.4 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 94% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.4Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

The IEEE 1588 PTP management-message parser in subsys/net/lib/ptp/tlv.c mishandles the PTP_MGMT_TIME management id. In tlv_mgmt_post_recv(), the PTP_MGMT_TIME case casts mgmt_tlv->data to a 10-byte struct ptp_timestamp and reads it (then byte-swaps and writes it back) without first checking that the TLV data field is at least sizeof(struct ptp_timestamp). Every sibling management id in the same switch validates its length first; PTP_MGMT_TIME was the only case lacking that check.

The length passed in is the management data size (tlv->length - 2), and the upstream guard in ptp_tlv_post_recv() only requires tlv->length > 2, while msg_tlv_post_recv() validates only that the TLV fits within the received byte count, not a per-id minimum. A peer on the local PTP segment can therefore send a PTP_MSG_MANAGEMENT message carrying a short PTP_MGMT_TIME TLV (data as small as 2 bytes), causing the parser to read and write 8 bytes beyond the validated data. The message type and TLV contents are taken straight off the wire, so the path is reachable by any adjacent attacker when CONFIG_PTP is enabled.

The over-read and write-back stay within the struct ptp_msg allocation (mgmt_tlv->data lives in the leading mtu[NET_ETH_MTU] union member, so data + 10 lands at most a few bytes past mtu[], inside the same object), so this is an out-of-bounds read of adjacent in-object memory plus a bounded in-place corruption of the message's parsed timestamp, not past-allocation memory corruption. Impact is limited to minor information exposure of adjacent bytes and corruption of the device's parsed management TIME value; there is no crash on the access and no reachable reference-count corruption.

The fix adds if (length < sizeof(struct ptp_timestamp)) { return -EBADMSG; } before the cast, matching the other management-id cases and fully closing the receive-path defect.

CVSS v3
5.4
EG Score
5.4(medium)
EG Risk
24(Track)
EG Risk 24/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity54% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
6%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 26, 2026

Last Modified

August 26, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 26, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
github Patch Available

Out-of-bounds read in PTP management TLV TIME parsing in Zephyr net PTP · Advisory · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr · GitHub

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-mh5r-jxh8-hxwx
github_commit

commit de98c3721a0e (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)

Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit de98c3721a0e — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/de98c3721a0e21ca269313997736f4f6193909ef

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 10× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 01:40 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-28 23:58 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-27 18:50 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-26 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-26 15:50 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-26 14:23 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-26 14:22 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-13481?
CVE-2026-13481 is a medium vulnerability published on August 26, 2026. The IEEE 1588 PTP management-message parser in subsys/net/lib/ptp/tlv.c mishandles the PTPMGMTTIME management id. In tlvmgmtpostrecv(), the PTPMGMTTIME case casts mgmttlv->data to a 10-byte struct ptptimestamp and reads it (then byte-swaps and writes it back) without first checking that the TLV…
When was CVE-2026-13481 disclosed?
CVE-2026-13481 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 26, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-13481 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-13481 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 94.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-13481?
CVE-2026-13481 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.4 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-13481?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-13481, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-13481

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-13481?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.