CVE-2026-13478

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.1%, top 99% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

The Zephyr ext2 filesystem driver validates the on-disk block bitmap in ext2_init_fs() (subsys/fs/ext2/ext2_impl.c) by passing fs_blocks = s_blocks_count - s_first_data_block to ext2_bitmap_count_set(). That helper (subsys/fs/ext2/ext2_bitmap.c) treats its argument as a number of bits and reads one bitmap byte per eight bits, but the bitmap buffer (BGROUP_BLOCK_BITMAP) is a single fetched block of only fs->block_size bytes (capacity fs->block_size * 8 bits). s_blocks_count and s_first_data_block are taken verbatim from the superblock and were never bounded against this single-group capacity; ext2_verify_disk_superblock() checks the magic, revision, and block-size shift but not the block count.

A crafted ext2 image with an oversized s_blocks_count (up to ~4 billion, against a maximum 4096-byte block / 32768-bit bitmap) makes ext2_bitmap_count_set() scan roughly 512 MB of memory past the bitmap block — a large out-of-bounds read of the static block slab and adjacent memory.

The defect is reached during mount: ext2_init_fs() is invoked from ext2_mount() (subsys/fs/ext2/ext2_ops.c), the registered .mount operation. Any path that mounts an attacker-supplied ext2 image (removable media, a disk/flash partition, or a downloaded image) triggers it. The kernel-privileged parser operates on attacker-controlled data, so the bug is exploitable wherever untrusted ext2 media can be mounted.

Impact is an out-of-bounds read only: the resulting bit count is compared internally and the mount is rejected, so no attacker-controlled bytes are returned (not a useful information leak). The ~512 MB over-read will almost certainly cross an unmapped or MPU-protected boundary and fault, crashing the system — a denial of service triggered by mounting a single malformed image. The fix rejects any image whose fs_blocks exceeds fs->block_size * 8 before the scan.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
1%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 26, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
github Patch Available

Out-of-bounds read in Zephyr ext2 block-bitmap validation from a crafted s_blocks_count · Advisory · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr · GitHub

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-gj29-7f7m-4c29
github_commit

commit 9c0f869da070 (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)

Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit 9c0f869da070 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/9c0f869da07009d9d4bca7a99e995f9b8cea7da2

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 11× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-29 11:36 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-27 15:14 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-26 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-25 20:23 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-25 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-25 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-25 16:25 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-25 16:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-13478?
CVE-2026-13478 is a medium vulnerability published on August 25, 2026. The Zephyr ext2 filesystem driver validates the on-disk block bitmap in ext2initfs() (subsys/fs/ext2/ext2impl.c) by passing fsblocks = sblockscount - sfirstdatablock to ext2bitmapcountset(). That helper (subsys/fs/ext2/ext2bitmap.c) treats its argument as a number of bits and reads one bitmap byte…
When was CVE-2026-13478 disclosed?
CVE-2026-13478 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 25, 2026, with the most recent update on August 26, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-13478 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-13478 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-13478?
CVE-2026-13478 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-13478?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-13478, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-13478

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-13478?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.