CVE-2026-13215

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.86.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 92% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
6.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 6.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

The Zephyr ext2 filesystem driver fails to validate the s_log_block_size field of the on-disk superblock when mounting a filesystem. ext2_verify_disk_superblock() in subsys/fs/ext2/ext2_impl.c checks the magic number, revision, inode size and group counts, but never bounds s_log_block_size. On a successful verify, subsys/fs/ext2/ext2_ops.c computes fs->block_size = 1024 << superblock.s_log_block_size from this attacker-controlled uint32_t, so a crafted value either overflows the shift (undefined behaviour) or yields a block size far larger than CONFIG_EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE.

That block size is then passed to k_mem_slab_init() by ext2_init_blocks_slab() to carve CONFIG_EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_COUNT blocks out of the fixed static buffer __ext2_block_memory_buffer, whose size is CONFIG_EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_COUNT * CONFIG_EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE. k_mem_slab_init() does not verify that the requested blocks fit the buffer, and the ext2 wrapper discards its return value, so the slab is laid out past the end of the static buffer. The mount immediately reads block-group, bitmap and inode blocks of fs->block_size bytes each into these slab blocks, producing an out-of-bounds write into adjacent static memory on the first block read.

The entire path is gated only by data read from the mounted image, making this reachable by any attacker who can present a crafted ext2 image to a device that mounts it (for example a removable SD card or storage medium). Because the ext2 driver runs in kernel mode, supplying image bytes yields a supervisor-mode memory-corruption primitive, with impact ranging from denial of service to potential code execution.

The fix rejects s_log_block_size values that overflow the shift (greater than 11) or that produce a block size exceeding CONFIG_EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE, so the block slab can no longer be initialized larger than its backing buffer.

CVSS v3
6.8
EG Score
6.8(medium)
EG Risk
31(Track)
EG Risk 31/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity68% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
8%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 26, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
github Patch Available

Zephyr ext2 mount: unvalidated superblock block size causes out-of-bounds write from a crafted filesystem image · Advisory · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr · GitHub

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-j52j-gfj9-rwjm
github_commit

commit f270f4bd0e59 (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)

Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit f270f4bd0e59 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/f270f4bd0e59585da31e1fbaa79c5abf73f1364b

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 13× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-29 00:18 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-27 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-26 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-25 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-25 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-25 05:25 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-25 04:45 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-25 04:45 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-13215?
CVE-2026-13215 is a medium vulnerability published on August 25, 2026. The Zephyr ext2 filesystem driver fails to validate the slogblocksize field of the on-disk superblock when mounting a filesystem. ext2verifydisksuperblock() in subsys/fs/ext2/ext2impl.c checks the magic number, revision, inode size and group counts, but never bounds slogblocksize. On a successful…
When was CVE-2026-13215 disclosed?
CVE-2026-13215 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 25, 2026, with the most recent update on August 26, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-13215 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-13215 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 92.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-13215?
CVE-2026-13215 has a CVSS v3 base score of 6.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-13215?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-13215, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-13215

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-13215?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.