CVE-2026-13215

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.86.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
6.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 6.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).

The Zephyr ext2 filesystem driver fails to validate the s_log_block_size field of the on-disk superblock when mounting a filesystem. ext2_verify_disk_superblock() in subsys/fs/ext2/ext2_impl.c checks the magic number, revision, inode size and group counts, but never bounds s_log_block_size. On a successful verify, subsys/fs/ext2/ext2_ops.c computes fs->block_size = 1024 << superblock.s_log_block_size from this attacker-controlled uint32_t, so a crafted value either overflows the shift (undefined behaviour) or yields a block size far larger than CONFIG_EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE.

That block size is then passed to k_mem_slab_init() by ext2_init_blocks_slab() to carve CONFIG_EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_COUNT blocks out of the fixed static buffer __ext2_block_memory_buffer, whose size is CONFIG_EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_COUNT * CONFIG_EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE. k_mem_slab_init() does not verify that the requested blocks fit the buffer, and the ext2 wrapper discards its return value, so the slab is laid out past the end of the static buffer. The mount immediately reads block-group, bitmap and inode blocks of fs->block_size bytes each into these slab blocks, producing an out-of-bounds write into adjacent static memory on the first block read.

The entire path is gated only by data read from the mounted image, making this reachable by any attacker who can present a crafted ext2 image to a device that mounts it (for example a removable SD card or storage medium). Because the ext2 driver runs in kernel mode, supplying image bytes yields a supervisor-mode memory-corruption primitive, with impact ranging from denial of service to potential code execution.

The fix rejects s_log_block_size values that overflow the shift (greater than 11) or that produce a block size exceeding CONFIG_EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE, so the block slab can no longer be initialized larger than its backing buffer.

CVSS v3
6.8
EG Score
6.8MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
31
EG Risk 31/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity68% × 45%
The EG Score, 6.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
7th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 28, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Fix referenced — no release confirmed yet. Sources: github, github_commit.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Zephyr ext2 mount: unvalidated superblock block size causes out-of-bounds write from a crafted filesystem image · Advisory · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr · GitHub

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-j52j-gfj9-rwjm
GitHub commit

commit f270f4bd0e59 (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)

Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit f270f4bd0e59 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/f270f4bd0e59585da31e1fbaa79c5abf73f1364b

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  4. 2026-10-11 20:11 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 12:22 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  11. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  12. 2026-10-08 07:32 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  14. 2026-10-07 05:06 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  16. 2026-10-06 02:41 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  19. 2026-10-03 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  21. 2026-10-02 12:53 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  23. 2026-10-01 09:18 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  25. 2026-09-30 06:54 UTCEG score recompute
Show 59 more
  1. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-09-28 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  4. 2026-09-28 00:35 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-26 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  7. 2026-09-25 15:59 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-24 12:51 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  10. 2026-09-23 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-22 08:02 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-21 05:37 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  14. 2026-09-20 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-19 00:18 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  17. 2026-09-17 21:53 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-16 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  20. 2026-09-15 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-14 13:21 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  23. 2026-09-13 10:57 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  25. 2026-09-12 08:33 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  27. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  28. 2026-09-11 06:08 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  30. 2026-09-09 01:18 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  32. 2026-09-07 22:18 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  34. 2026-09-06 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  36. 2026-09-05 17:27 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-04 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  39. 2026-09-03 12:30 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  41. 2026-09-02 10:05 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  43. 2026-09-01 07:37 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  45. 2026-08-31 05:09 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  47. 2026-08-30 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  49. 2026-08-29 00:18 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  51. 2026-08-27 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  53. 2026-08-26 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-25 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-25 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  57. 2026-08-25 05:25 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-25 04:45 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 6.8 MEDIUM
  59. 2026-08-25 04:45 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-13215?
CVE-2026-13215 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 25, 2026. The Zephyr ext2 filesystem driver fails to validate the slogblocksize field of the on-disk superblock when mounting a filesystem. ext2verifydisksuperblock() in subsys/fs/ext2/ext2impl.c checks the magic number, revision, inode size and group counts, but never bounds slogblocksize. On a successful…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-13215 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-13215 was published on August 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 28, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-13215 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-13215 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-13215?
CVE-2026-13215 has a CVSS base score of 6.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-13215?
A fix for CVE-2026-13215 is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but EchelonGraph has no release containing it on record. Check that reference and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains the fix and update to it; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-13215

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-13215?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.