A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url() function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (100.64.0.0/10). This occurs because Python's ipaddress module does not classify such addresses as is_private or is_global, and the current guard only checks is_private and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed.
CVE-2026-12372
Score 3.7 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2026-08-10. a secondary CVSS source baseline 3.7; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 3.7
- EG Score
- 3.7(high)
- EG Risk
- 33(Track)EG Risk 33/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity37% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 18%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 9, 2026
Last Modified
August 12, 2026
References (2)
- security@huntrhttps://huntr.com/bounties/2911b643-571c-42e4-b0c2-9a1fa6f491db
- 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0https://huntr.com/bounties/2911b643-571c-42e4-b0c2-9a1fa6f491db
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-12372(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 24× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 20:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 20:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 19:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 19:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 19:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-12 17:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 17:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 23:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 22:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 22:56 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-12372?
When was CVE-2026-12372 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-12372 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-12372?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-12372?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-12372
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-12372?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.