CVE-2026-12233

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.95.9—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (41st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
5.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 5.9Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The PSA Protected Storage credential backend (subsys/net/lib/tls_credentials/tls_credentials_trusted.c) declared its credential-store mutex as a plain zero-filled static struct k_mutex credential_lock; and never called k_mutex_init() on it. A statically zero-filled k_mutex has an uninitialized wait queue (its dlist head/tail are NULL instead of the self-referential sentinels that k_mutex_init/K_MUTEX_DEFINE install). The uncontended lock path does not touch the wait queue, so the defect is latent and serialized use behaves correctly.

When two execution contexts contend on the lock, k_mutex_lock() pends the blocking thread on the wait queue via z_pend_curr(), which calls sys_dlist_append() on the zeroed list and dereferences a NULL tail pointer (tail->next = node), faulting the kernel. The lock is held during TLS handshake credential loading and by all credential add/get/delete operations, so a deployment performing concurrent TLS handshakes (for example a server handling multiple simultaneous connections from a remote peer) or a credential-management operation concurrent with a handshake can trigger the dereference.

The impact is a denial of service: a deterministic kernel panic / device reset on the first contention. There is no memory corruption beyond the NULL dereference and no confidentiality or integrity impact; mutual exclusion on the fast path remains correct. Exposure is limited to builds with CONFIG_TLS_CREDENTIALS_BACKEND_PROTECTED_STORAGE enabled (PSA Protected Storage / TF-M platforms); the default volatile RAM backend initializes its lock correctly and is unaffected.

The fix initializes the mutex statically with K_MUTEX_DEFINE(credential_lock), providing a valid wait queue so the contended path no longer touches a NULL list.

CVSS v3
5.9
EG Score
5.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
27
EG Risk 27/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity59% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
41st
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

August 12, 2026

Last Modified

August 26, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 12, 2026
No fix on record yet. Sources: github, github_commit.
githubMentions a patch (unverified)

Uninitialized mutex in TLS trusted-credential backend causes kernel NULL-deref DoS under contention · Advisory · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr · GitHub

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-57c4-xcq2-fqj7
github_commit

commit 29581d586f3d (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)

Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit 29581d586f3d — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/29581d586f3d68ec8bb1448b522e5470d4a06aa9

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-06 17:33 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-03 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-10-02 08:24 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-30 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-28 10:17 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-27 09:58 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-25 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-23 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-22 21:08 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-21 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 68 more
  1. 2026-09-20 16:42 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-19 13:13 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-18 12:55 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-17 12:16 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-16 10:50 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-16 05:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-15 09:13 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-14 08:55 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-13 08:37 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-12 08:19 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-11 07:58 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-09 07:22 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-08 07:04 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-07 05:57 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-06 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-05 01:58 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-09-02 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-09-01 11:46 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-31 09:54 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-30 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-29 08:58 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-27 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-26 17:26 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-25 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-24 21:37 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-23 21:02 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-22 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-08-21 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-19 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-18 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-17 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-16 17:38 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-08-15 17:10 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-08-14 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-13 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-13 15:34 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-13 05:47 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-08-12 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-12 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-12 04:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-12233?
CVE-2026-12233 is a medium vulnerability published on August 12, 2026. The PSA Protected Storage credential backend (subsys/net/lib/tlscredentials/tlscredentialstrusted.c) declared its credential-store mutex as a plain zero-filled static struct kmutex credentiallock; and never called kmutexinit() on it. A statically zero-filled kmutex has an uninitialized wait queue…
When was CVE-2026-12233 disclosed?
CVE-2026-12233 was first published on August 12, 2026, with the most recent update on August 26, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-12233 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-12233 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (41st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-12233?
CVE-2026-12233 has a CVSS base score of 5.9 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-12233?
No fix for CVE-2026-12233 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-12233

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-12233?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.