Prefab UI's Generative UI sandbox runs caller-supplied Python inside Pyodide, Python compiled to WebAssembly, in a Deno subprocess. The feature is documented as isolation for untrusted code, including LLM-written UI. From prefab-ui 0.14.0 through 0.20.2 the launcher starts Deno with unrestricted --allow-read, --allow-write, and --allow-net, and the runner leaves the Deno API on the JavaScript global object. Pyodide's js module proxies that global, so the Python can call Deno.readTextFileSync and Deno.writeTextFileSync. A caller who can supply the code can read and write files as the server OS user, and can persist code execution by writing a .pth file into the server virtualenv's site-packages. The usual remote path is FastMCP's GenerativeUI provider, which registers the MCP tool generate_prefab_ui and forwards that tool's code argument into this sandbox. On a FastMCP server with no authentication configured, any client who can reach the server can call the tool. With authentication, any client allowed to call tools can. Generative UI is opt-in, and the host must have Deno installed. Confirmed on prefab-ui 0.20.2. Fixed in 0.21.0: after the runtime and Prefab sources load, the runner revokes Deno read, write, and network permission before it accepts code, the process is started with --no-prompt so a permission request cannot grant them again, and bootstrap network access is limited to cdn.jsdelivr.net. The fix is commit 030f074 (pull request 538).
CVE-2026-120338
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 10.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-11-01. A secondary CVSS source baseline 10.0; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-114859 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3g72-rrqc-f76c (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 10.0
- EG Score
- 10.0CRITICALhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 45EG Risk 45/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity100% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.8% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.8%
- EPSS %ILE
- 55th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.8% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-02). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
November 1, 2026
Last Modified
November 2, 2026
Advisory Details (8)
Auto-updated Nov 2, 2026v0.21.0: UI, Robot
Patch available: PrefectHQ/prefab v0.21.0
https://github.com/PrefectHQ/prefab/releases/tag/v0.21.0v0.20.2: Fine Print
Patch available: PrefectHQ/prefab v0.20.2
https://github.com/PrefectHQ/prefab/releases/tag/v0.20.2v0.14.0: Main Stream
Patch available: PrefectHQ/prefab v0.14.0
https://github.com/PrefectHQ/prefab/releases/tag/v0.14.0Refresh dependencies and fix renderer and sandbox regressions
Patch available: PrefectHQ/prefab v0.21.0 (PR #538 merged 2026-10-25)
https://github.com/PrefectHQ/prefab/pull/538commit 030f074f85e0 (PrefectHQ/prefab)
Patch available: PrefectHQ/prefab v0.21.0 (contains commit 030f074f85e0)
https://github.com/PrefectHQ/prefab/commit/030f074f85e0b1be0dd44b0283185aecb26337a2GitHub - PrefectHQ/prefab: 🎨 The generative UI framework that even humans can use. · GitHub
https://github.com/PrefectHQ/prefabVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-120338(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 12× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-11-02 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3g72-rrqc-f76c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-02 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 19:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3g72-rrqc-f76c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-02 19:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3g72-rrqc-f76c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-02 18:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-02 18:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3g72-rrqc-f76c · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-11-01 17:02 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-114859 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-11-01 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-11-01 15:27 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 10.0 CRITICAL
- 2026-11-01 15:26 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-120338?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-120338 published?
Is CVE-2026-120338 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-120338?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-120338?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-120338
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-120338?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.