A vulnerability was determined in BlackBeltTechnology pi-agent-dashboard up to 0.8.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard of the component WebSocket Gateway. Executing a manipulation of the argument cwd can lead to origin validation error. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version 0.9.0 is sufficient to fix this issue. This patch is called 48fd0bad5adfe76af9736599699d51a5f60019f6. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
CVE-2026-112101
MEDIUMPre-NVD 4.34.3Trending — 5 sources updated this weekElevatedEG-KEV Tier 3: ElevatedEG-KEV is EchelonGraph's own tiering of exploitation signals from CISA KEV, CISA's SSVC data (Vulnrichment), ransomware data, public exploit-code references and EPSS.Tier 3 is not evidence of exploitation. It means public exploit code is referenced, or CISA's SSVC data says "public PoC", or EPSS ranks the CVE in the top 5%.Signals for this CVE: CISA's SSVC exploitation value: public PoC.EchelonGraph confidence 38%: a heuristic from the tier and the number of signals, not a measured probability.
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 4.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2026-10-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 4.3; sources differ by 0.0.
Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
4.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 4.3Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 4.3
- EG Score
- 4.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 35EG Risk 35/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity43% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 17th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (4.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 4.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 19, 2026
Last Modified
October 19, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Oct 19, 2026Patch available. Sources: github_pr, github_commit, github_release.
Web page
GitHub - BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard: Real-time web dashboard for pi coding-agent sessions. Multi-session view, live chat mirroring, integrated terminal, diff viewer, pi-flows execution, and mobile-first remote control via mDNS or zrok tunnel. Coexists with pi's TUI — doesn't replace it. · GitHub
https://github.com/BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/GitHub release Patch Available
v0.9.0
Patch available: BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard v0.9.0
https://github.com/BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/releases/tag/v0.9.0GitHub commit
commit 48fd0bad5adf (BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard)
Fix landed in BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard commit 48fd0bad5adf — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/commit/48fd0bad5adfe76af9736599699d51a5f60019f6GitHub pull request
fix(fix-ws-origin-cswsh): gate cross-site WebSocket and mutating REST by Origin (#625)
Fix merged in BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard PR #636 on 2026-09-12 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/pull/636Web page
Unauthenticated Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH) in the local dashboard server leads to Remote Code Execution · Issue #625 · BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard · GitHub
https://github.com/BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard/issues/625Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-112101(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 14× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
- 2026-10-19 17:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wx6r-347g-2f27 · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-10-19 17:25 UTCNVD updateCVSS v4 → 2.1
- 2026-10-19 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 17:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wx6r-347g-2f27 · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-10-19 17:02 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v4 → 5.3
- 2026-10-19 15:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 15:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-wx6r-347g-2f27 · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 4.3
- 2026-10-19 10:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 10:26 UTCNVD updateCVSS v4 → 2.1
- 2026-10-19 09:40 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 4.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-19 09:39 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-112101?
CVE-2026-112101 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 19, 2026. A vulnerability was determined in BlackBeltTechnology pi-agent-dashboard up to 0.8.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard of the component WebSocket Gateway. Executing a manipulation of the argument cwd can lead to origin validation error.…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-112101 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-112101 was published on October 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-112101 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-112101 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (17th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-112101?
CVE-2026-112101 has a CVSS base score of 4.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-112101?
A fix for CVE-2026-112101 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-112101 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-112101
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-112101?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.