A vulnerability was found in alexpasmantier television up to 0.15.9. Affected by this issue is the function Entry::output of the file television/channels/entry.rs. Performing a manipulation of the argument raw results in command injection. The attack requires a local approach. The reported GitHub issue was closed with the label "not planned".
CVE-2026-111876
MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3Trending — 5 sources updated this weekElevatedEG-KEV Tier 3: ElevatedEG-KEV is EchelonGraph's own tiering of exploitation signals from CISA KEV, CISA's SSVC data (Vulnrichment), ransomware data, public exploit-code references and EPSS.Tier 3 is not evidence of exploitation. It means public exploit code is referenced, or CISA's SSVC data says "public PoC", or EPSS ranks the CVE in the top 5%.Signals for this CVE: CISA's SSVC exploitation value: public PoC.EchelonGraph confidence 38%: a heuristic from the tier and the number of signals, not a measured probability.
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2026-10-18. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.
Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed
A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 40EG Risk 40/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity53% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. - EPSS PROB
- 0.6%
- EPSS %ILE
- 49th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-19). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 18, 2026
Last Modified
October 19, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Oct 18, 2026Fix referenced — no release confirmed yet. Sources: github_pr.
GitHub pull request
fix: sanitize control characters in selected entry output
Upstream fix in progress (PR #1125 · alexpasmantier/television, state=closed)
https://github.com/alexpasmantier/television/pull/1125Web page
Selected entry printed on exit isn't stripped of terminal escape sequences, allowing injection via a crafted file name · Issue #1124 · alexpasmantier/television · GitHub
https://github.com/alexpasmantier/television/issues/1124Web page
GitHub - alexpasmantier/television: A very fast, portable and hackable fuzzy finder. · GitHub
https://github.com/alexpasmantier/television/Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-111876(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 16× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-19 20:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 20:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84pv-hx2c-786x · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-19 20:26 UTCNVD updateCVSS v4 → 1.9
- 2026-10-19 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84pv-hx2c-786x · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-19 19:22 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v4 → 4.8
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-19 15:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-19 15:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-84pv-hx2c-786x · GitHub severity LOW · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
- 2026-10-18 06:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 06:25 UTCNVD updateCVSS v4 → 1.9
- 2026-10-18 05:52 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.3 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-18 05:50 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-111876?
CVE-2026-111876 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 18, 2026. A vulnerability was found in alexpasmantier television up to 0.15.9. Affected by this issue is the function Entry::output of the file television/channels/entry.rs. Performing a manipulation of the argument raw results in command injection. The attack requires a local approach. The reported GitHub…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-111876 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-111876 was published on October 18, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-111876 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-111876 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-111876?
CVE-2026-111876 has a CVSS base score of 5.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-111876?
A fix for CVE-2026-111876 is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but EchelonGraph has no release containing it on record. Check that reference and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains the fix and update to it; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-111876 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-111876
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-111876?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.