CVE-2026-109201

HIGHPre-NVD 8.38.3
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-12. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 8.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.

LogicalDOC Community Edition through 9.3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in SoapDocumentService operations that allows authenticated users to access and modify unauthorized documents. Attackers can call copy, getExtractedText, deleteVersion, reindex, deleteLink, or restore via SOAP or /services/rest/document with sequential document IDs to disclose, delete, or tamper with documents.

CVSS v3
8.3
EG Score
8.3HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity83% × 45%
The EG Score, 8.3 of 10.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
15th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 12, 2026

Last Modified

October 13, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 12, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit.
Web page

LogicalDOC Community Edition through 9.3 Missing Authorization in DocumentService | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/logicaldoc-community-edition-through-9.3-missing-authorization-in-documentservice
Web page

GitHub - logicaldoc/community: LogicalDOC Community open source document management system https://www.logicaldoc.com · GitHub

https://github.com/logicaldoc/community
Web page

community/logicaldoc-webservice/src/main/java/com/logicaldoc/webservice/soap/endpoint/SoapDocumentService.java at 9.3 · logicaldoc/community · GitHub

https://github.com/logicaldoc/community/blob/9.3/logicaldoc-webservice/src/main/java/com/logicaldoc/webservice/soap/endpoint/SoapDocumentService.java#L445
GitHub commit

commit 648047ee0ec9 (logicaldoc/community)

Fix landed in logicaldoc/community commit 648047ee0ec9 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/logicaldoc/community/commit/648047ee0ec95c294bb983e511fed60dbc67977f
Web page

Multiple High-Severity Issues in Community <=9.3.1 (SQLi, Auth Bypass, IDORs, SSRF, RCE patterns) · logicaldoc community · Discussion #119 · GitHub

https://github.com/logicaldoc/community/discussions/119

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-109201(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 11× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-13 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-13 20:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g833-jpqm-6g28 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.3
  3. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  4. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-13 16:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g833-jpqm-6g28 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.3
  6. 2026-10-13 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-13 15:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-g833-jpqm-6g28 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.3
  8. 2026-10-12 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-12 14:26 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-12 13:55 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.3 HIGH
  11. 2026-10-12 13:51 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-109201?
CVE-2026-109201 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 12, 2026. LogicalDOC Community Edition through 9.3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in SoapDocumentService operations that allows authenticated users to access and modify unauthorized documents. Attackers can call copy, getExtractedText, deleteVersion, reindex, deleteLink, or restore via SOAP…
When was CVE-2026-109201 made public?
CVE-2026-109201 was made public on October 11, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 12, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 13, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-109201 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-109201 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (15th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-109201?
CVE-2026-109201 has a CVSS base score of 8.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-109201?
An upstream fix for CVE-2026-109201 has been merged but is not yet in a tagged release. Until it ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, then update to the release that contains the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-109201 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-109201

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-109201?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.