jshERP through 3.6 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in LogController that allows any authenticated user to forge, modify, or delete audit log entries. Low-privilege users can call /log/add, /log/update, /log/delete, and /log/deleteBatch to fabricate entries, rewrite user and IP fields, or erase records to hide activity.
CVE-2026-109178
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 5.4 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-10-12. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.4; sources differ by 0.0.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
The CVE record's CNA (VulnCheck) lists jishenghua jshERP versions up to and including 3.6 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS v3
- 5.4
- EG Score
- 5.4MEDIUMhigh confidence
- EG Risk
- 40EG Risk 40/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity54% × 45%The EG Score, 5.4 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 11th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 12, 2026
Last Modified
October 13, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 12, 2026jshERP through 3.6 Missing Authorization via /log Audit Endpoints | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/jsherp-through-3.6-missing-authorization-via-log-audit-endpointsjshERP/jshERP-boot/src/main/java/com/jsh/erp/service/LogService.java at 8f28e7c2fe54d54de3621a414f5df1833dc5a55f · jishenghua/jshERP · GitHub
https://github.com/jishenghua/jshERP/blob/8f28e7c2fe54d54de3621a414f5df1833dc5a55f/jshERP-boot/src/main/java/com/jsh/erp/service/LogService.java#L82-L129jshERP/jshERP-boot/src/main/java/com/jsh/erp/controller/LogController.java at 8f28e7c2fe54d54de3621a414f5df1833dc5a55f · jishenghua/jshERP · GitHub
https://github.com/jishenghua/jshERP/blob/8f28e7c2fe54d54de3621a414f5df1833dc5a55f/jshERP-boot/src/main/java/com/jsh/erp/controller/LogController.java#L70-L100cve-request-poc/jshERP/poc_audit_log_and_message_tampering.py at a7b6d1423555812d8efa26c91c5d0683164b31e5 · AnkesKasty/cve-request-poc · GitHub
https://github.com/AnkesKasty/cve-request-poc/blob/a7b6d1423555812d8efa26c91c5d0683164b31e5/jshERP/poc_audit_log_and_message_tampering.pyVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-109178(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 10× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 16:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8q4w-hp56-9m89 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-13 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 15:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8q4w-hp56-9m89 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-13 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 15:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8q4w-hp56-9m89 · GitHub CVSS 5.4
- 2026-10-12 16:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 13:18 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 5.4 MEDIUM
- 2026-10-12 13:16 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-109178?
When was CVE-2026-109178 made public?
Is CVE-2026-109178 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-109178?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-109178?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-109178
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-109178?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.